Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 14;11:338. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-338

Table 3.

WOMAC index and sub process cost sum distributions {€] for TKA changed after the introduction of a clinical pathway.

before pathway implementation after pathway implementation, without personal briefing after pathway implementation, including personal briefing
(n = 132) (n = 70) (n = 58)
WOMAC index before surgery [%] 41%
(32; 48%)
44%
(34; 50%)
46%
(39; 54%)

WOMAC index three months after surgery [%] 83%
(68; 91%)
82%
(74; 91%)
83%
(66; 90%)

intraindividual three months change in WOMAC [%] 39%
(27; 48%)
range -20; 69%
38%
(30; 47%)
range -6; 68%
30%
(21; 45%) rrange +1; 71%

sub process cost sum [] 4303
(4130; 4660 €)
4149
(3980; 4443 €)
4244
(4097; 4412 €)

individual cost effectiveness ratio [/% WOMAC change] 108 /%
(86; 150 €/%)
110 /%
(88; 145 €/%)
135 /%
(102; 211 €/%)

individual effect costs [% WOMAC change/1000 process cost investment] 9%/1000
(6; 11%/1000€)
9%/1000
(7; 11%/1000€)
7%/1000
(5; 10%/1000€)

medians and quartiles for the total WOMAC osteoarthritis index [%, 100% = optimum rating] before and three months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as well as intraindividual post - pre change [%] of the index, sub process cost sum {€] for TKA from the hospital's perspective as well as individual ratios between the latter (cost effectivemess, [€/%] and effect costs [%/1000 € investment], respectively), assessed in 132 patients, who underwent TKA before implementation of a critical pathway on TKA, versus 128 patients, who underwent TKA after path implementation (the latter being stratified for attendance of a personal briefing as a voluntary part of the pathway)