Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 6;7(3):e33122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033122

Table 3. Nested case control study for analysis of association between being incident case and potential risk-factor.

Risk factors Case (n = 6) Control (n = 44) OR (95%CI) P-value
Gender (%) [ a ] male 3 20 1
female 3 24 1.20 (0.14–9.95) 1.0000
Cancer (%) [ a ] yes 6 37 1
no 0 7 na 0.5760
HSCT (%) [ a ] yes 4 14 1
no 2 30 4.29 (0.52–51.04) 0.1710
Surgery (%) [ a ] yes 6 34 1
no 0 10 na 0.3271
Transfusion (%) [ a ] yes 2 7 1
no 4 37 2.64 (0.20–22.58) 0.2629
CVC (%) [ a ] yes 4 22 1
no 2 22 2.00 (0.25–23.94) 0.6688
Median age (IQR) [ b ] 57 (52–72) 66 (52.5–73) - 0.7088
Median exposure to mp-LD (IQR) [ b - c ] 29.5 (15–31) 0 (0–11) - 0.0102
Overall - 6 44 - -

All the 50 susceptible patients enrolled in the historical cohort (i.e. patients admitted to oncohematology unit between 4 May 2006 and 21 February 2007) were included in the risk analysis. Case were all patients defined as “incident cases” while control were all patients still “susceptible” ≥6 months after their last admission to the oncohematology unit. The results of the risk analysis provided good evidence of association between the time of exposure to multi-patient lancing devicewhile admitted with the index case and the HBV infections.

OR = odds ration; 95%CI = 95% confidence interval; mp-LD = multi-patients lancing device, HSCT = hematopoietic stem cells transplant; CVC = central venous catheter; na = not any, Fisher confidence levels not possible with zero count cells (all cases were exposed).

a

) 95%CI and p-value according to Fisher's exact test.

b

) p-value according to Mann–Whitney U test.

c

) This represents patients' median exposure (in days) to multi-patient lancing device while admitted with the index case and until the onset of acute hepatitis or the first positive test for HBV.