Table 3.
Subject 1 |
Subject 2 |
Subject 3 |
Subject 4 |
Subject 5 |
Subject 6 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
%Weight | %r | %Weight | %r | %Weight | %r | %Weight | %r | %Weight | %r | %Weight | %r | |
Ankle | ||||||||||||
X | 0.75 | 0 | 1.99 | 2.98 | 1.85 | −1.42 | 1.1 | 0 | 1.25 | 3.5 | 1.27 | 3.12 |
Y | 0.17 | −1.26 | 0.61 | 5.19 | 3.91 | −1.13 | 1.69 | 0 | 0.42 | 2.89 | 2.32 | −1.17 |
Z | 0.3 | 0 | 68.06 | 9.67 | 6.55 | 0 | 2.29 | 0 | 0.44 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 0 |
Joint Angle | 0.72 | 0 | 8.55 | 0 | 8.3 | 0 | 2.98 | −1.21 | 0.79 | −1.47 | 1.22 | 0 |
Ang Vel | 0.6 | 0 | 3.93 | −4.47 | 0.6 | 0 | 2.32 | −1.13 | 0.46 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 |
Knee | ||||||||||||
X | 0.15 | 0 | 4.62 | −1.28 | 9.23 | −1.35 | 3 | −1.63 | 3.28 | 0 | 0.39 | 1.75 |
Y | 0.22 | 0 | 7.9 | −6.09 | 0.2 | −1.09 | 1.29 | −1.09 | 0.13 | 2.89 | 0.65 | 0 |
Z | 0.13 | 0 | 11.7 | −2.32 | 1.22 | −1.35 | 2.75 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.36 | 1.5 | 0 |
Joint Angle | 0.2 | 1.26 | 2.17 | −1.11 | 2 | −1.09 | 1.29 | 0 | 0.78 | 0 | 0.73 | 0 |
Ang Vel | 2.15 | 0 | 3.89 | −2.24 | 1.09 | −1.16 | 4.52 | −1.07 | 0.78 | 1.35 | 1.54 | 0 |
Hip | ||||||||||||
X | 0.55 | −1.28 | 8.4 | −4.87 | 1.68 | 0 | 2.8 | −1.29 | 0.3 | 1.78 | 1.36 | 0 |
Y | 0.59 | −1.47 | 0.49 | 0 | 2.57 | −1.23 | 3.67 | 0 | 0.93 | 0 | 1.82 | −1.88 |
Z | 0.78 | −1.26 | 5.91 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 2.26 | −2.29 | 0.66 | 1.42 | 1.61 | 0 |
Joint Angle | 0.49 | 0 | 11.68 | −4.76 | 0.77 | 0 | 1.34 | −1.12 | 1.06 | 1.42 | 0.67 | 0 |
Ang Vel | 0.44 | 0 | 5.42 | −7.5 | 3.27 | −1.09 | 2.55 | 0 | 0.54 | 3.03 | 1.04 | 0 |
Differences in % between correlation coefficient (r) and the ratio between weights for the prediction of different walking parameters for the 6 subjects decoded under precision walking with and without eye electrode are shown. Positive values mean an increase of r and weight with eye electrode, while negative values mean a decrease of r and weight with eye electrode.