. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 7.

Published in final edited form as: J Ambul Care Manage. 2009 Apr-Jun;32(2):123–131. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31819942e5

Table 3.

Odds ratios: health care quality measures (N=7,234)

	Health Care Quality (good or very good=1)		Return Again for Care (yes=1)		Improved Health Condition (yes=1)

	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Health care subsystems
Private	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
IMSS	0.21^***	(0.15, 0.27)	0.41^***	(0.30, 0.55)	0.39^***	(0.30, 0.50)
SSA	0.38^***	(0.28, 0.51)	0.76^*	(0.55, 1.04)	0.46^***	(0.36, 0.59)
ISSSTE	0.21^***	(0.14, 0.31)	0.38^***	(0.24, 0.59)	0.43^***	(0.29, 0.63)
Others	0.64^**	(0.40, 1.00)	1.10	(0.72, 1.67)	0.73^*	(0.50, 1.05)
Age/10	1.15^***	(1.08, 1.22)	1.13^***	(1.06, 1.22)	0.97	(0.92, 1.02)
Gender
Male	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
Female	0.97	(0.80, 1.19)	0.88	(0.70, 1.09)	0.85^*	(0.70, 1.02)
Married
No	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
Yes	1.05	(0.86, 1.28)	0.97	(0.78, 1.21)	0.90	(0.75, 1.08)
Indigenous
No	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
Yes	0.93	(0.48, 0.81)	1.06	(0.84, 1.35)	1.09	(0.89, 1.33)
Health status
Good or very good	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
Fair or poor	0.62^***	(0.48, 0.81)	0.65^***	(0.49, 0.84)	0.58^***	(0.46, 0.72)
Education level
Primary	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
Secondary	1.06	(0.81, 1.38)	1.00	(0.75, 1.34)	0.82^*	(0.64, 1.04)
High school	1.24	(0.92, 1.66)	0.81	(0.60, 1.11)	0.86	(0.65, 1.13)
College or higher	1.71^***	(1.16, 2.53)	1.28	(0.86, 1.91)	0.97	(0.67, 1.40)
Income/10,000	0.92	(0.76, 1.11)	0.91	(0.76, 1.10)	0.97	(0.78, 1.21)
Insured
No	Reference	—	Reference	—	Reference	—
Yes	1.02	(0.81, 1.30)	0.97	(0.75, 1.24)	1.00	(0.82, 1.23)

Note: National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANut 2006). All results have been weighted using survey sampling weights

p<0.1

^**

p<0.05

^***

p<0.01