Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 24;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-63

Table 3.

Comparison of the reliability of estimating A-to-I RNA editing of the Dα6 subunit using the peak height ratio method between Dα6IR2 and Dα6285F primers at different rates of expected editing

Editing Site

Seq. Primer 398 400 415 416
Dα6IR2 0.98 ± 0.03
(1.00)
1.00 ± 0.03
(1.00)
0.97 ± 0.05
(1.00)
0.97 ± 0.05
(1.00)
Dα6285F 0.94 ± 0.10
(0.99)
0.88 ± 0.10*
(0.99)
0.80 ± 0.07*
(0.99)
0.85 ± 0.04*
(1.00)

Values are the slopes and associated confidence intervals of editing estimate vs. expected values. Numbers in parentheses indicate the r2 value. Slopes with * indicate values that are significantly different than 1.0 (i.e., 95% CI does not include 1.0)