Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 7;7(3):e32667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032667

Table 1. Influence of copy number alterations in gene deregulation in cervical cancer cell lines.

Frequency of deregulated genesa
CN+ CN− All
Cell line Genesb CN+ n EX+ % n EX+ % EX+ %
CaLo 6,864 4,487 532 11.9 16,254 1,686 10.4 2,218 10.7
CaSki 7,706 4,912 728 14.8 15,829 2,197 13.9 2,925 14.1
HeLa 14,276 8,875 2,207 24.9 11,866 3,088 26 5,295 25.5
SiHa 17,829 11,120 1,125 10.1 9,621 944 9.8 2,069 10
Average 11,669 7,349 1,148 15.6 13,393 1,979 14.8 3,127 15
Recurrent genese 1,264c 783 147 18.8 19,958 2,975 14.9 3,122d 15.1
a

20,741 genes were explored for changes in expression with HG-ST1.0 microarray. On average 7,349 of them were CN-altered (CN+) and 13,393 did not have copy number alterations (CN−).

b

Potentially copy number altered genes according to data obtained with 100 k microarray. On average only 63% of those genes were explored for changes in gene expression (numbers in column n of CN+ subset).

c

Genes who were copy number altered in the four cell lines.

d

Genes who were found deregulated when all four cell lines, by triplicate, were compared together against the control sample (n = 10).

e

In the genome, included genes that were found in MRRs, and in the transcriptome, include genes which were found deregulated uniformly in the four cell lines (described in d).

EX+ = Genes that were up- or down- regulated in cancer cell lines compared with the control sample.