Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 24;21(3):425–431. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1981-5

Table 4.

Predictive validity of postural stability

Pain Roland Morris Questionnaire
Non-normalised data p Normalised data p Non-normalised data p Normalised data p
No or negative change Clinical relevant change No or negative change Clinical relevant change No or negative change Clinical relevant change No or negative change Clinical relevant change
n 37 42 37 42 35 36 35 36
mVel EC, mm/sec at first visit, mean (CV) 16.2 (39%) 15.1 (30%) 0.36 15.7 (28%) 15.5 (24%) 0.88 15.0 (32%) 15.2 (37%) 0.88 15.4 (24%) 15.5 (27%) 0.84
APdispl EC, mm at first visit, mean (CV) 51.6 (41%) 54.6 (28%) 0.47 52.8 (35%) 55.1 (25%) 0.56 58.6 (30%) 54.1 (34%) 0.29 58.0 (23%) 53.6 (32%) 0.24
RRvel at first visit, mean (SD) 1.41 (0.25) 1.32 (0.19) 0.08 1.40 (0.21) 1.32 (0.20) 0.11 1.41 (0.19) 1.32 (0.21) 0.09 1.41 (0.19) 1.32 (0.21) 0.07

Patients are grouped in two according to pain and back-specific function: patients with minimal important change compared to patients with no or negative change during follow-up period. Difference in postural stability in the two groups are presented. Changes are presented as back transformed