Table 6.
Results of logistic regression regressing CRC screening on predisposing, need for care and enabling characteristics (n=123; age >=52 years)
| Predisposing characteristics | Need for care characteristics | Enabling characteristics | Predisposing, need for care, and enabling characteristics |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | β (SE) | OR | 95% CI | β(SE) | OR | 95% CI | β(SE) | OR | 95% CI | B (SE) | OR | 95% CI |
| Predisposing | ||||||||||||
| Age (years) | 0.02 (0.49) |
1.02 | 0.93, 1.12 |
0.07 (0.06) |
1.08 | 0.95, 1.22 |
||||||
| Version English Spanish |
−0.09 (0.42) |
0.91 | 0.40, 2.08 |
0.23 (0.56) |
1.26 | 0.42, 3.76 |
||||||
| Education 6 groups | 0.13 (0.13) |
1.14 | 0.88, 1.48 |
0.20 (0.18) | 1.22 | 0.87, 1.72 |
||||||
| Partner | 0.54 (0.40) |
1.71 | 0.79, 3.78 |
0.98 (0.58) |
2.65 | 0.86 8.19 |
||||||
| Need-for-care | ||||||||||||
| Perceived health status | −0.01 (0.23) |
0.99 | 0.63, 1.56 |
−0.16 (0.27) |
0.85 | 0.50, 1.45 |
||||||
| BMI | 0.03 (0.03) |
1.03 | 0.97, 1.10 |
0.03 (0.03) | 1.03 | 0.97, 1.10 |
||||||
| BC adherence (no=0, yes=1) |
2.00 (0.82)* |
7.41 | 1.49, 36.87 |
1.80 (0.86)* | 6.02 | 1.11, 32.63 |
||||||
| CC adherence (no=0, yes=1) |
−0.31 (0.56) |
0.73 | 0.24, 2.21 |
−0.19 (0.59) | 0.83 | 0.26, 2.63 |
||||||
| Menopausal status (postmenopausal=0, premenopausal=1) |
1.56 (0.83) |
4.77 | 0.95, 24.07 | 2.37 (0.96)* |
10.73 | 1.63, 70.75 |
||||||
| Enabling | ||||||||||||
| Yearly income 6 groups | 0.01 (0.12) |
1.01 | 0.80, 1.29 |
−0.12 (0.20) |
0.89 | 0.60, 1.32 |
||||||
| Insurance (no =0, yes=1) | 1.18* (0.49) |
3.26 | 1.26, 8.46 |
1.12 (0.57)* | 3.06 | 1.00, 9.31 |
||||||
| Usual source of care (no=0, yes=1) |
0.64 (0.55) |
1.89 | 0.65, 5.52 |
0.21 (0.64) |
1.23 | 0.35, 4.34 |
||||||
| −2 Log likelihood | 163 | 144 | 154 | 130 | ||||||||
| Cox and Snell R-squared | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.21 | ||||||||
| Nagelkerke R-squared | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.28 | ||||||||
*
Note. p < .0.05