Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 8;8(3):e1002416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002416

Figure 5. Variability in mitochondrial mass and functionality can both contribute to noise in transcription rate.

Figure 5

Effects of changing variability in mitochondrial mass inheritance (Inline graphic) and functionality (Inline graphic) on overall transcription rate noise Inline graphic. This contour plot shows the value of Inline graphic for a given combination of Inline graphic. More stochasticity associated with inheritance of mitochondrial properties leads to higher transcription rate noise, and stochasticity in both mass and functional inheritance plays an important role in transcription rate noise. Contour lines on the bottom surface mark different values of Inline graphic. The ‘X’ mark denotes the default parameterisation of our model. Other contour lines show that this relationship remains essentially identical when variability due to cell cycle stage and volume inheritance is removed, suggesting that Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the key sources of transcription rate noise.