Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 8;7(3):e32182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032182

Table 6. Logistic regression analyses.

Adjusted odds ratio* (95% CI) Any retinopathyR1, R2 or R3(n = 20,344) Any proliferative diabetic retinopathyR2 or R3(n = 2,195) CSMOM1P1(n = 2,446) STDRR2 or R3 or M1P1(n = 3,426)
Age (per year age) 1.007 (1.006, 1.008) 1.005 (1.002, 1.009) 1.019 (1.016,1.022) 1.012 (1.099,1.015)
Men 1 1 1 1
Women 0.93 (0.90,0.97) 0.77 (0.71,0.84) 0.91 (0.84,0.99) 0.84 (0.78,0.90)
West Yorkshire 1 1 1 1
South East London 0.91 (0.87, 0.94) 0.69 (0.63, 0.77) 1.79 (1.61, 1.99) 1.04 (0.96,1.13)
Type I diabetes 1 1 1 1
Type 2 diabetes 0.47 (0.43, 0.51) 0.32 (0.27, 0.37) 0.42 (0.35, 0.49) 0.35 (0.31, 0.40)
White Europeans 1 1 1 1
African/Afro-Caribbeans 1.79 (1.70, 1.89) 1.61 (1.42, 1.82) 2.12 (1.91, 2.35) 1.99 (1.81,2.18)
South Asians 1.10 (1.02, 1.18) 1.52 (1.31, 1.77) 1.98 (1.71, 2.30) 1.82 (1.61, 2.06)
Other 0.75 (0.70, 0.80) 0.59 (0.48, 0.72) 0.68 (0.57, 0.81) 0.68 (0.58, 0.79)
*

Adjusted for all factors on the table.

CSMO- clinically significant macular oedema; R1- Mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; R2- Severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; R3- Proliferative diabetic retinopathy; M1P1- laser treated diabetic maculopathy; STDR-sight threatening diabetic retinopathy.