Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;101(11):2693–2703. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.059

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Docking efficiency measured for NAv-coated SUVs. (A) Concentration measurement of single diffusing SUVs. The CV-values were 44.1 ± 0.1 nM (red line) and 29.8 ± 0.1 nM (green line). Black lines indicate a linear fit to the data. (B) Direct extraction of docking efficiency (PD) by a global maximum-likelihood fit to the complete set of experiments performed with SUVs displaying 2.0 mol % (red line) or 10 mol % (green line) DOPE-biotin in the membrane. From Eq. 15 we found PD = (2.2 ± 0.6) × 10−5 and PD = (4.4 ± 0.5) × 10−5 for 2 mol % and 10 mol % DOPE-biotin, respectively. (C) Confocal fluorescence micrograph sequence displaying DiD-C18-stained diffusing biotinylated SUVs docking onto an SLB presenting NAv. Red circles indicate diffusing SUVs probing the SLB interface, and the green circle identifies a successfully docked vesicle. Scale bar is 5.0 μm. (D) Distribution of SUV docking attempts (NDIF) experienced by the SLB resolved as a function of vesicle radius R. The inset shows the number of diffusing SUVs for two different experiments with [Na+] = 80 mM (red) and [Na+] = 120 mM (green) corresponding to C¯V = 0.10 nM and C¯V = 0.21 nM, respectively. (E) The size distribution of all SUVs that successfully docked after t = 358 s normalized by the average bulk concentration of SUVs (C¯V) for direct comparison among experiments. Docking reactions took place in buffers with [Na+] = 80 mM (green) and [Na+] = 120 mM (red).