Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 30;13(2):274–288. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr044

Table 2.

Value of the conditional odds ratio, θcx, (top half) and corresponding estimates of actual power (bottom half), based on a case–control study with n0 = n1 = 1250, for an assumed marginal effect size of θmx = 1.3, under various scenarios for the strength of confounding. The (marginal) outcome and exposure prevalences are Pr(Y = 1) = 0.05 and Pr(X = 1) = 0.2, respectively, and the (conditional) confounder prevalence among the unexposed is fixed at Pr(Z = 1|X = 0) = 0.2

Confounder/exposure odds ratio, ϕxz
Confounder effect, θcz 0.33 0.50 0.67 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.00
Conditional odds ratio, θcx
    0.33 1.19 1.22 1.25 1.30 1.38 1.44 1.57
    0.50 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.49
    0.67 1.25 1.26 1.27 1.30 1.33 1.36 1.42
    1.00 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30
    1.50 1.38 1.36 1.34 1.30 1.26 1.23 1.18
    2.00 1.45 1.41 1.37 1.30 1.23 1.17 1.10
    3.00 1.59 1.49 1.42 1.30 1.18 1.09 0.98
Estimated actual power
    0.33 41 52 62 77 90 96 100
    0.50 51 59 66 77 88 94 98
    0.67 61 66 71 78 84 89 93
    1.00 76 77 77 78 78 77 76
    1.50 90 88 84 78 66 55 38
    2.00 96 94 89 76 55 36 15
    3.00 100 98 94 76 38 15 5