Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Dec 24;8:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.12.006

Table 6.

Transmural end-systolic growth strains EESg from ES week 1 to ES week 8. Means and standard deviations are displayed for n=11 animals. P-values are from two-tailed paired t-tests comparing ES at week 8 with ES at week 1, i.e., with zero.

epi mid endo
20% depth p 50% depth p 80% depth p
ECCg
0.03±0.19 0.58 0.10±0.22 0.16 0.11±0.17 0.07
ELLg
0.14±0.20 0.04 0.16±0.20 0.03 0.21±0.18 0.00
ERRg
−0.21±0.12 0.00 −0.20±0.10 0.00 −0.15±0.14 0.01
ECLg
0.02±0.13 0.56 0.00±0.10 0.95 −0.01±0.09 0.60
ELRg
0.04±0.06 0.03 0.07±0.08 0.02 0.09±0.17 0.12
ECRg
−0.02±0.14 0.68 −0.01±0.07 0.49 0.01±0.09 0.73

EFFg
0.03±0.15 0.49 0.10±0.21 0.14 0.16±0.15 0.00