Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar;19(3):251–260. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2011.0078

Table 1.

Prediction Results of Dataset-2 Using Various Linear Classifiers

 
 
Number of Z curve variables
 
 
69
189
252
Length Classifiers Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Std Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Std Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Std
192 bp FDA 96.36 96.74 96.55 / 96.09 96.99 96.54 / 88.93 85.41 87.17 0.47
  PLS 98.52 95.49 97.01 0.89 98.40 96.23 97.31 0.90 98.64 96.39 97.52 0.90
  LS 98.23 95.16 96.70 0.89 98.32 95.65 96.98 0.90 91.43 89.38 90.4 1.19
  RR 98.23 95.12 96.68 0.89 98.52 95.57 97.05 0.90 98.56 96.02 97.29 0.90
42 bp FDA 90.84 80.74 80.79   80.18 81.50 80.84   77.31 73.39 75.35 0.56
  PLS 87.61 78.75 83.18 0.70 87.82 81.95 84.88 0.75 88.44 82.46 85.45 0.78
  LS 87.20 76.38 81.79 0.71 85.65 78.54 82.10 0.77 82.67 77.00 79.83 1.09
  RR 89.78 74.22 82.00 0.69 89.78 74.53 82.15 0.72 89.78 75.66 82.72 0.74
30 bp FDA 82.83 68.17 75.50   77.26 71.10 74.18   73.74 67.00 70.37 0.41
  PLS 82.83 73.16 77.99 0.65 81.07 74.33 77.70 0.84 81.36 76.38 78.87 0.79
  LS 81.95 69.93 75.94 0.68 71.98 69.64 70.81 0.84 71.40 64.95 68.17 1.19
  RR 87.81 60.55 74.18 0.59 82.53 62.90 72.72 0.70 78.43 65.53 71.98 0.75
21 bp FDA 71.29 71.78 71.53   68.81 69.80 69.30   63.86 62.87 63.37 0.28
  PLS 74.26 79.70 76.98 0.64 76.73 79.70 77.22 0.82 78.71 79.70 79.21 0.79
  LS 73.28 71.29 72.28 0.71 71.78 69.80 70.79 1.04 70.30 66.34 68.32 1.41
  RR 80.20 55.94 68.07 0.57 80.69 64.36 72.52 0.75 75.74 71.78 73.76 0.92

The average accuracies of PLS models, which were the best ones among the algorithms evaluated here, are shown in boldface. The results of FDA calculated by Gao and Zhang (2004) are shown in italics. Std, standard deviations of prediction results; FDA, Fisher discriminant analysis; LS, least squares; PLS, partial least squares; RR, ridge regression.