Table 2.
Used a condom during last sex? Significant associations in bold |
Number of partners, other than husband or cohabiting partner, For respondents in union; Significant associations in bold |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Predictor Variables | Mean | Sig | N | Primary Predictor Variables | Mean | Sig |
by SES1 | by SES1 | |||||
yes | 2.19 | 0.00 | 1012 | 0 | 1.85 | 0.44 |
no | 0.79 | 1+ | 1.77 | |||
by NDVI, 20002 | by NDVI, 20002 | |||||
yes | 55.18% | 0.18 | 1012 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.42 |
no | 57.60% | 1+ | 0.59 | |||
by change NDVI, 1990–20002 | by change NDVI, 1990–20002 | |||||
yes | −0.06 | 0.57 | 1012 | 0 | −0.06 | 0.78 |
no | −0.06 | 1+ | −0.06 | |||
by % change NDVI, 1990–20002 | by % change NDVI, 1990–20002 | |||||
yes | −9.67% | 0.83 | 1012 | 0 | −9.82% | 0.8 |
no | −10.04% | 1+ | −9.57% | |||
Control Variables | Control Variables | |||||
by awareness of ways to avoid AIDS | by awareness of ways to avoid AIDS | |||||
aware - no condom | 92.68% | 0.00 | 1013 | aware - extra-union partners | 21.23% | 0.32 |
not aware - no condom | 98.13% | not aware - extra-union partners | 18.55% | |||
Age (in years) | Age (in years) | |||||
yes | 25.85 | 0.03 | 1002 | yes | 30.56 | 0.00 |
no | 28.59 | no | 25.42 | |||
Education (in years) | Education (in years) | |||||
yes | 3.79 | 0.00 | 1012 | yes | 2.94 | 0.47 |
no | 2.82 | no | 2.83 | |||
With partner (married or cohabiting) | Catholic | |||||
with partner - no condom | 96.27% | Catholic - extra-union partners | 22.05% | |||
no partner - no condom | 89.74% | 0.00 | 1013 | Not Catholic - extra-union partners | 17.77% | 0.11 |
Catholic | ||||||
Catholic - no condom | 94.64% | |||||
Not Catholic -- no condom | 95.93% | 0.33 | 1013 |
asset index: higher value = more assets, lower level of poverty
NDVI = “greenness” measure calculated from satellite imagery.