Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb;2(2):354–369. doi: 10.1002/ece3.87

Table 5.

Number and timing of divergence events estimated from MsBayes analyses, assignment of species to each divergence event accounting for uncertainty, and level of support for a single divergence event for each possible suite of species

Co-divergence Event Number of taxon pairs Divergence Time (τ) Divergence time (in years) Possible suites of species Ω var(τ)/E(τ) Ψ


Mode 2.5%–97.5% Mode 2.5%–97.5%
Tau 1 Ψ = 4 8.297E-06 0.000–0.333 10 0–396,843 Eopsaltria griseogularis, Drymodes brunneopygia, Malurus pulcherrimus, Glossopsitta porphyrocephala 0.0000 1
1(or 5) +Gliciphila melanops 0.0000 1
Tau 2 Ψ = 3 0.232 0.000–1.267 276,430 0–1,508,049 2Malurus splendens, Climacteris rufus 0.0130 32
+Gliciphila melanops 30.0910 1
+Phylidonyris novaehollandiae 0.0041 1
1(or 4) +Gliciphila melanops, Phylidonyris novaehollandiae 0.0180 1
Tau 3 Ψ = 2 1.145 0.499–2.871 1,363,215 594,382–3,417,699 Melithreptus lunatus, Petroica boodang + Phylidonyris novaehollandiae 0.0006 1
1(or 3) 0.0020 1
1

A total of eight taxa were assigned to respective divergence events with confidence. Accounting for uncertainty, the number of taxon pairs for each divergence event is in parentheses.

2

Malurus splendens and Climacteris rufus were assigned with confidence to the second divergence event, and were analyzed alone, however the divergence event includes either Gliciphila melanops or Phylidonyris novaehollandiae, or both of these species (Psi = 3 (or 4)).

3

Ω very close to zero and Ψ = 1 indicates support for a single divergence event. A single divergence event for Malurus splendens and Climacteris rufus alone was not supported (Ψ = 2). A single divergence event for Malurus splendens, Climacteris rufus and Gliciphila melanops was not well supported, with Ω = 0.091 a significant outlier (P < 0.05).