Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 14;13(1):134–142. doi: 10.1208/s12249-011-9729-4

Table V.

Result of In Situ Palatability Study

Palatability parameters
Formulation code Taste Aftertaste Mouthfeel Ease of handling Acceptance
A 2.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 0.1 4.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1
B 3.0 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.1
C 3.0 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.1
D 3.0 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2
E 4.0 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.1 4.0 ± 0.2
F 3.0 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.2
G 3.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.3 4.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2
H 2.0 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2
Statistical analysis (Kruskal–Wallis test) p < 0.05 p < 0.05 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p < 0.05
Post hoc test (Mann–Whitney test) E and A (p < 0.05) E and A (p < 0.05) E and A (p < 0.05) E and A (p < 0.05)
E and B (p < 0.05) E and B (p < 0.05) E and B (p < 0.05) E and B (p < 0.05)
E and C (p < 0.05) E and C (p < 0.05) E and C (p < 0.05) E and C (p < 0.05)
E and D (p < 0.05) E and D (p < 0.05) E and D (p < 0.05) E and D (p < 0.05)
E and F (p < 0.05) E and F (p < 0.05) E and F (p < 0.05) E and F (p < 0.05)
E and G (p < 0.05) E and G (p < 0.05) E and G (p < 0.05) E and G (p < 0.05)
E and H (p < 0.05) E and H (p < 0.05) E and H (p < 0.05) E and H (p < 0.05)

Mean ± SD, n = 16