Table 7.
Study Two: Prediction of Problem Drinking, Smoker Status, and Depression
| Girls | Boys | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | p value | OR | p value | |
| Problem Drinking | ||||
| Step 1 | ||||
| Pubertal status | 2.81 | <.001 | 2.65 | <.001 |
| Step 2 | ||||
| Pubertal status | 2.02 | . 04 | 2.23 | .01 |
| Lack of planning | 1.65 | .13 | 1.56 | .14 |
| Lack of perseverance | 1.90 | .08 | 1.65 | .14 |
| Negative affect | 1.38 | .11 | 1.14 | .51 |
| Negative urgency | 2.95 | <.001 | 2.39 | .001 |
| Smoker Status | ||||
| Step 1 | ||||
| Pubertal status | 3.63 | <.001 | 3.18 | <.001 |
| Problem drinking | 41.26 | <.001 | 10.28 | <.001 |
| Step 2 | ||||
| Pubertal status | 3.39 | .002 | 2.90 | .001 |
| Problem drinking | 23.54 | <.001 | 6.11 | <.001 |
| Lack of planning | 2.00 | .06 | 1.28 | .42 |
| Lack of perseverance | 1.96 | .10 | 2.30 | .02 |
| Negative affect | .93 | .76 | .73 | .13 |
| Negative urgency | 2.39 | .004 | 3.92 | <.001 |
| Girls | Boys | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | p value | R2 | b | p value | R2 | |
| Depression | ||||||
| Step 1 | .03 | .01 | ||||
| Pubertal status | .18 | <.001 | .09 | .01 | ||
| Step 2 | .33 | .24 | ||||
| Pubertal status | .13 | .04 | .06 | .03 | ||
| Lack of planning | .10 | .002 | .05 | .18 | ||
| Lack of perseverance | −.02 | .51 | −.04 | .21 | ||
| Negative affect | .38 | <.001 | .40 | <.001 | ||
| Negative urgency | .24 | <.001 | .15 | <.001 | ||
Note: n (girls) = 905; n (boys) = 908. Note: problem drinking and smoker status were predicted using binary logistic regression and depression was predicted using least squares linear regression. OR: odds ratio; b: standardized beta weight.