Table 2.
Yield and purity (%) of the 96-well plate production of 18 {1–24, 1–4}
| R1NH2 (16) | R2NC (17)
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Y | P | Y | P | Y | P | Y | P | |
| 1 | nr | - | 46 | 100 | 57 | 100 | 53 | 98 |
| 2 | nr | - | un | - | un | - | un | - |
| 3 | nr | - | 45 | 100 | 45 | 100 | 66 | 100 |
| 4 | nr | - | 45 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 65 | 100 |
| 5 | 69 | 97 | 42 | 100 | 53 | 100 | 64 | 98 |
| 6 | 49 | 100 | 36 | 100 | 38 | 100 | 55 | 100 |
| 7 | 50 | 100 | 39 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 54 | 100 |
| 8 | 57 | 100 | 42 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 62 | 100 |
| 9 | 57 | 100 | 42 | 100 | 55 | 100 | 49 | 100 |
| 10 | 56 | 98 | 41 | 100 | 51 | 100 | 60 | 100 |
| 11 | 23 | 70 | 16 | 100 | 8 | 100 | 13 | 100 |
| 12 | 47 | 100 | 34 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 53 | 100 |
| 13 | 46 | 100 | 41 | 100 | 48 | 100 | 63 | 100 |
| 14 | 49 | 100 | nr | - | 38 | 100 | 59 | 100 |
| 15 | 38 | 100 | 27 | 100 | 43 | 100 | 47 | 100 |
| 16 | 45 | 100* | 47 | 100 | 27 | 100 | 8 | 100* |
| 17 | 56 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 58 | 100 | 61 | 100 |
| 18 | 51 | 100 | 39 | 100 | 39 | 100 | 61 | 100 |
| 19 | 26 | 100 | 23 | 100 | 29 | 100 | 33 | 100 |
| 20 | 55 | 100 | 51 | 100 | 61 | 100 | 83 | 95 |
| 21 | 59 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 64 | 100 | 72 | 100 |
| 22 | 7 | 93* | 22 | 100* | 6 | 100* | 2 | 100* |
| 23 | un | - | un | - | un | - | un | - |
| 24 | 28 | 96 | 24 | 100 | 18 | 100 | 55 | 100 |
Y = Yield (%); P = Purity (%) based on UV 214 nm; nr = not recovered/lost during purification; un = no cyclization to 18 observed;
purity based on ELS