Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2012 Jan 13;120(3):237–250. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.11.003

Table 7.

Correlations between (a) the overall magnitude of semantic interference, and (b) semantic interference at the SOA = −1000 ms and performance on pre-test neuropsychological and language measures.

Magnitude of SI SI at −1000 ms

r P r P
Neuropsychological
MMSE −.037 .874 .080 .730
WMS-III
Measures Immediate −.174 .519 −.035 .897
WMS-III Delayed −.193 .474 .175 .516
Facial Recognition .095 .690 −.042 .861
Trail Test A −.052 .828 −.099 .679
Visual Verbal
Shifts −.161 .523 .226 .367
Visual Verbal
Points −.183 .468 .214 .394

Language WAB-AQ .009 .969 .104 .652
Measures WAB-F .177 .443 .046 .844
WAB-AC −.108 .643 .000 .999
WAB-R .027 .907 −.090 .697
WAB-N −.247 .281 .163 .479
BNT −.193 .401 −.055 .814
NNB-Noun .085 .715 −.286 .208
NNB-N:V −.372 .096 .371 .098
PPVT −.191 .434 −.007 .977
PPT-Word −.252 .312 .373 .127
PPT-Picture −.206 .370 .030 .898

Note: Pearson correlation (2-tailed)