Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Spine J. 2012 Feb 18;12(2):121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.01.012

Table 2.

Univariate Analysis of Relative Risk for unintended durotomy during Spine Surgery

Risk Factors Dural Tear 161 (10%) No Dural Tear 1430 (90%) RR of Dural Tear 95% CI p-value
Length of Follow-Up1 (months), mean (sd) 22.4 (19.0) 16.5 (16.1)
Age (yr), mean (sd) 54.6 (14.6) 49.0 (16.0) < 0.001*
    18 - 39 26 (6%) 405 (94%) 1.00 - 0.002*
    40 - 64 94 (11%) 765 (89%) 1.81 1.19 – 2.76
    ≥65 41 (14%) 260 (86%) 2.26 1.41 – 3.61
Gender
    Male 82 (9%) 832 (91%) 1.00 - 0.08
    Female 79 (12%) 598 (88%) 1.30 0.97 – 1.74
Smoking
    No 119 (11%) 984 (89%) 1.00 - 0.18
    Yes 42 (9%) 446 (91%) 0.80 0.57 – 1.12
Alcohol
    No 93 (10%) 830 (90%) 1.00 - 0.95
    Yes 68 (10%) 600 (90%) 1.01 0.75 – 1.36
Drug Use
    No 149 (10%) 1275 (90%) 1.00 - 0.18
    Yes 12 (7%) 155 (93%) 0.69 0.39 – 1.21
Diabetes
    No 134 (9%) 1278 (91%) 1.00 - 0.02*
    Yes 27 (15%) 152 (85%) 1.59 1.08 – 2.33
BMI 28.5 (7.2) 27.6 (6.4) 0.13
    Underweight (< 18.5) 10 (7%) 130 (93%) 1.00 - 0.47
    Normal (18.5 - < 25) 47 (9%) 463 (91%)
    Overweight (25 - < 30) 54 (11%) 449 (89%) 1.22 0.86 – 1.74
    Obese (30 - < 35) 28 (10%) 240 (90%) 1.19 0.78 – 1.83
    ≥ 35 22 (13%) 148 (87%) 1.48 0.93 – 2.34
Charlson Comorbidity Adjusted for Diabetes, mean (sd) 1.4 (1.7) 1.2 (1.6) 0.16
    0 63 (9%) 618 (91%) 1.00 - 0.35
    1 34 (10%) 315 (90%) 1.05 0.71 – 1.57
    2 25 (13%) 169 (87%) 1.39 0.90 – 2.15
    3 13 (10%) 122 (90%) 1.04 0.59 – 1.84
    ≥ 4 22 (14%) 138 (86%) 1.49 0.94 – 2.34
Diagnosis Group
    Degenerative 131 (13%) 860 (87%) 1.00 - < 0.001
    Trauma 14 (4%) 358 (96%) 0.28 0.17 – 0.49
    Neoplasm 8 (7%) 109 (93%) 0.52 0.26 – 1.03
    Infection 6 (10%) 53 (90%) 1.30 0.60 – 2.82
    Other 2 (4%) 50 (96%) 0.29 0.07 – 1.14
Diagnosis Level
    Lumbosacral 124 (16%) 643 (84%) 1.00 - < 0.001
    Cervical 26 (4%) 556 (96%) 0.27 0.18 – 0.42
    Thoracic 11 (5%) 229 (95%) 0.28 0.16 – 0.52
Revision
    No 99 (8%) 1207 (92%) 1.00 - < 0.001
    Yes 62 (22%) 223 (78%) 2.87 2.15 – 3.84
Surgical Approach
    Posterior 90 (10%) 844 (90%) 1.00 - < 0.001
    Anterior 7 (2%) 285 (98%) 0.25 0.12 – 0.53
    Combined 64 (18%) 301 (82%) 1.82 1.35 – 2.45
Invasiveness Index, mean (sd) 11.3 (9.9) 8.2 (7.1) < 0.001
    1 - 5 65 (9%) 668 (91%) 1.00 - < 0.001
    6 - 10 27 (7%) 383 (93%) 0.74 0.48 – 1.14
    11 – 15 28 (12%) 212 (88%) 1.32 0.87 – 2.00
    16 - 20 13 (14%) 79 (86%) 1.59 0.92 – 2.77
    21 - 25 9 (19%) 38 (81%) 2.16 1.15 – 4.06
    > 25 19 (28%) 50 (72%) 3.11 1.98 – 4.86

RR=Relative Risk, CI = confidence intervals