Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 17;40(5):2041–2053. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1042

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of algorithms for SIH on NA12878 whole genome fosmid sequence data. (A) Adjusted N50 which takes into consideration block length and number of phased SNPs but not quality; (B) Switch error rate, calculated using comparison with gold-standard trio haplotypes; (C) Quality adjusted N50 which combined measures of completeness and quality; (D) Runtimes of each algorithm on this data set (log scale); (E) QAN50 for ReFHap, DGS, FastHare and HapCUT on subsets of the data built by varying the number of fosmid pools considered; (F) QAN50 for ReFHap, DGS, FastHare and HapCUT for different heterozygosity rates obtained by varying the percentages of SNPs considered.