Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;194(7):1763–1776. doi: 10.1128/JB.06711-11

Table 3.

Fold change in two independent experiments between bacterial load and nematode colonization frequency of nilB-FLAG insertion mutants

FLAG insertion Expt 1
Expt 2
Relative bacterial load (%)a Relative frequency (%)b Fold differencec Relative bacterial load (%) Relative frequency (%) Fold difference
aa 26 55.882 89.490 1.60 119.156 102.007 1.17
aa 186 52.574 52.352 1.00 61.039 49.763 1.23
aa 273 106.985 96.734 1.11 99.675 91.455 1.09
aa 322 32.279 25.762 1.25 60.390 38.542 1.57
aa 399 1.397 0.960 1.46 4.789 4.721 1.01
eTn7 0.042 0.015 2.86 0.009 0.009 1.00
None 100.000 100.000 1.00 100.000 100.000 1.00
a

Bacterial load was assessed by sonication of 10,000 nematodes and dilution plating to determine bacterial counts. Data are presented as percentages of the value for cells expressing wild-type nilB with no FLAG insertion.

b

Nematode colonization frequency was assessed by epifluorescence microscopy of nematodes grown on GFP-expressing bacteria. Data are presented as percentages of the value for cells expressing wild-type nilB with no FLAG insertion.

c

Fold difference represents the ratio of relative colonization frequency to relative bacterial load. A ratio of 1 indicates that the colonization defect of the strain is explained by a reduced frequency of colonization (e.g., initiation). A ratio of greater than 1 indicates that a defect in outgrowth contributes to observed defects in bacterial load.