Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 20;20(12):2102–2112. doi: 10.1002/pro.738

Table 1.

Summary of FRET Data and Comparison of X-ray and FRET-Derived Distances

C3bAx488:FH1-4Ax555 C3bAx647:FH1-4Ax555

Pair D (X-ray)a (Å) Averageb τ (ns) Efficiencyav Dav (Å)c Dmin (Å) Dmax (Å) Avd. τ (ns); don. vs. don. +acc. Efficiencyav 3Dav (Å) Dmin (Å) Dmax (Å)
C3bAx488 (alone) 1.87 ± 0.04
C3bAx488: CCP 1 [N29CAx555] 123 1.79 ± 0.05 4.4 ± 3.6 102 92 137
C3bAx488: CCP 2 [N102CAx555] 102 1.73 ± 0.05 7.9 ± 3.6 92 86 102
C3bAx488: CCP 2 [N125CAx555] 94 1.69 ± 0.06 9.6 ± 4.0 89 83 98
C3bAx647: CCP 3 [S199CAx555] 66 1.46 ± 0.02 22.1 ± 2.1 75 74 77 0.52 ± 0.04 vs. 0.45 ± 0.04 13.2 ± 10.5 76 68 101
C3bAx647: CCP 4 [N238CAx555] 35 1.08 ± 0.06 42.6 ± 3.6 64 63 66 0.82 ± 0.03 vs. 0.51 ± 0.05 37.6 ± 6.8 66 69 63
C3bAx647: CCP 4 [S254CAx555] 45 0.49 ± 0.02 74.1 ± 1.4 51 50 52 0.54 ± 0.04 vs. 0.30 ± 0.03 43.8 ± 6.8 59 56 61
a

Distance (D) between Cβ of relevant side chains.

b

Weighted average of two or three individual lifetime (τ) components used to fit decay curve.

c

Average D and range, DminDmax, calculated from FRET efficiencies and associated experimental errors.

d

Average lifetime for donor alone (don.) versus donor plus acceptor (don. + acc.).