Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):735–746. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2008

Table 6.

Principal Component Analysis of Qualitative CT Predictors, Age, and GCS

 
Components
Predictors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Age 0.05 −0.05 0.11 0.16 −0.16 0.96 0.08
GCS −0.12 0.96 −0.10 −0.06 0.11 −0.05 −0.20
SAH/IPH (present/absent) 0.09 −0.06 0.11 0.97 −0.06 0.16 0.11
SDH (present/absent) 0.15 −0.10 0.95 0.11 −0.04 0.12 0.17
EDH(present/absent) −0.04 0.10 −0.04 −0.05 0.98 −0.15 −0.04
Shift >5 mm (present/absent) 0.95 −0.12 0.15 0.10 −0.04 0.05 0.23
Cistern effacement 0.35 −0.30 0.25 0.16 −0.06 0.11 0.83

Principal component analysis of qualitative CT predictors, age, and GCS. Thick-lined boxes highlight high loading coefficients ≥0.9. Thin-lined boxes demonstrate intermediate loading coefficients from ∼0.3 up to 0.9. Components 4, 5, and 6 were each driven predominantly by a single feature (subarachnoid/intraparenchymal hemorrhage presence/absence, epidural hematoma presence/absence, and age). Again, there is re-demonstration of covariance among features related to intracranial mass effect (presence/absence of midline shift, presence/absence of cistern effacement, and presence/absence of subdural hematoma) in Components 1 and 3, as well as some collinearity between admission GCS and severity of cistern effacement (Component 2).

GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; IPH, intraparenchymal hemorrhage; SDH, subdural hematoma; EDH, epidural hematoma.