Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2012 Feb;18(1):159–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01767.x

Is the use of cholesterol in mortality risk algorithms in clinical guidelines valid? Ten years prospective data from the Norwegian HUNT 2 study

Halfdan Petursson 1, Johann A Sigurdsson 2, Calle Bengtsson 3, Tom I L Nilsen 4, Linn Getz 5
PMCID: PMC3303886  PMID: 21951982

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives

Many clinical guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention contain risk estimation charts/calculators. These have shown a tendency to overestimate risk, which indicates that there might be theoretical flaws in the algorithms. Total cholesterol is a frequently used variable in the risk estimates. Some studies indicate that the predictive properties of cholesterol might not be as straightforward as widely assumed. Our aim was to document the strength and validity of total cholesterol as a risk factor for mortality in a well-defined, general Norwegian population without known CVD at baseline.

Methods

We assessed the association of total serum cholesterol with total mortality, as well as mortality from CVD and ischaemic heart disease (IHD), using Cox proportional hazard models. The study population comprises 52 087 Norwegians, aged 20–74, who participated in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2, 1995–1997) and were followed-up on cause-specific mortality for 10 years (510 297 person-years in total).

Results

Among women, cholesterol had an inverse association with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–0.99 per 1.0 mmol L−1 increase] as well as CVD mortality (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.88–1.07). The association with IHD mortality (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.92–1.24) was not linear but seemed to follow a ‘U-shaped’ curve, with the highest mortality <5.0 and ≥7.0 mmol L−1. Among men, the association of cholesterol with mortality from CVD (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.98–1.15) and in total (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.93–1.03) followed a ‘U-shaped’ pattern.

Conclusion

Our study provides an updated epidemiological indication of possible errors in the CVD risk algorithms of many clinical guidelines. If our findings are generalizable, clinical and public health recommendations regarding the ‘dangers’ of cholesterol should be revised. This is especially true for women, for whom moderately elevated cholesterol (by current standards) may prove to be not only harmless but even beneficial.

Keywords: cardiovascular risk estimation, cholesterol, clinical guidelines, preventive medicine, primary care, mortality

Introduction

It has long been considered ‘common knowledge’ that total serum cholesterol is an important and strong, independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [14]. This association has been deemed to be linear, meaning ‘the lower the total cholesterol level, the better’. During the last decades, CVD prevention has been marked by a trend of gradually lowering thresholds of risk definitions regarding cholesterol levels [2,58], in parallel with other CVD risk factors such as hypertension and blood sugar [5,7,912]. Campaigns aimed at the general public have underlined the risks associated with total cholesterol above 5.0 mmol L−1 (see, for instance, the 2011 Norwegian campaign ‘Under 5’ at http://www.under5.no).

In recent years, a ‘combined estimate’ [2,7,8,1317] has become the most widespread method for CVD risk evaluation, as it is believed to have better predictive properties than the single risk factor approach. Most combined estimates include the risk factors of age, sex, smoking, blood pressure and serum cholesterol. Additionally, the algorithms include, to a varying degree, other factors such as diabetes, obesity, family history and cholesterol subfractions [low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol] [2,5,7,8,1217].

Some studies [1822], including papers from our research group [23,24], have problematized overestimation of CVD risk in authoritative, preventive clinical guidelines. Both single risk factors [24,25] and combined risk estimates have been addressed [23,26]. We have shown that according to authoritative CVD guidelines, 75% of the adult Norwegian population would be deemed at risk for CVD and in need of clinical attention (advice and supervision) [25,26]. Consequently, we have questioned the theoretical basis of the guidelines. In the present study, we look specifically at the validity of guidelines' risk estimations involving cholesterol. In particular, we challenge the widespread assumption of a linear relationship between total cholesterol levels and disease development (expressed as mortality in our analysis).

We are well aware of evidence indicating that cholesterol subparticles, including various lipoproteins, may have stronger associations with CVD development than total cholesterol [2734]. However, the emphasis on total cholesterol (as both a single risk factor and an element in multiple risk estimates) still prevails in many authoritative, clinical guidelines [1,7,17]. For instance, both the 2003 and the 2007 European Guidelines on CVD prevention state that ‘in general, total plasma cholesterol should be below 5,’ [2,16] and the risk charts in the same guidelines include total cholesterol.

In the past decades, a number of studies have found a strong and graded association between serum cholesterol and mortality from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) [14,3548]. Regarding total mortality, however, the association has not been clear. Some studies have found no association, and others have even suggested an inverse relationship [3841,43,4961]. Some studies have shown an inverse or a U-shaped association between cholesterol and death from causes other than CVD, such as cancer [52,56,62,63]. The phrase ‘U-shaped association’ (alternatively ‘J-shaped’) indicates that higher mortality (or incidences) can be observed both in individuals with low and high levels of cholesterol compared with individuals with levels in between. It is important to note, however, that the phrase ‘U-shaped’ does not necessarily indicate that both arms of the ‘U’ are equal in terms of mortality rates or the proportion of the population belonging to each arm.

Regarding the association between cholesterol and overall CVD mortality, some studies have found no association or a U-shaped or even an inverse association [37,58,61,6467]. This has been explained by an association with cerebral strokes (primarily haemorrhagic strokes), as opposed to heart disease [34,46,6772]. Interestingly, some studies have also found an inverse [55,67,73] or a U-shaped [61,7478] association with IHD incidence and mortality, primarily among individuals, aged 60 years and older.

The incidence, prevalence and mortality from CVD have decreased substantially throughout the Western world in recent decades [79,80]. There are also significant time trend changes regarding various risk factors for CVD [8183]. Changes have occurred, both regarding risk factors frequently included in combined risk estimates [8385] and for factors such as societal structure [86,87], pollution [88], television viewing [89] and dietary habits [90,91]. These on-going changes are likely to alter the predictive value of risk algorithms based on observational data collected years or even decades ago (retrospective risk bias). As cholesterol has become an essential part of lay-people's basic understanding of their health, and the prevalence of slightly ‘elevated’ cholesterol levels is so high, we believe that it is important to re-examine old assumptions regarding cholesterol as a risk factor.

The aim of the present study was to document the strength and validity of total serum cholesterol as a risk factor for mortality, as defined by current CVD prevention guidelines. For this purpose, we used data from a well-defined, general Norwegian population without known CVD at baseline. We focused on deaths from cardiovascular disease, IHD and death from all causes (total mortality) within a follow-up period of 10 years.

Methods

Study population

All adults, aged 20 years or older and living in Nord-Trøndelag County in Norway in 1995–1997, were invited to participate in the second wave of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2). Overall, 74% of women (34 786) and 65% of men (30 575) chose to participate. The HUNT 2 population is ethnically homogeneous (dominated by individuals of Nordic origin) and has been considered fairly representative of the total Norwegian population with respect to demography, socio-economic factors, morbidity and mortality, including mortality from CVD [92]. The HUNT 2 study has been described in detail elsewhere (see http://www.ntnu.no/hunt/english) [92].

For the purpose of the present analysis, the following HUNT 2 participants were excluded: 6780 individuals aged 75 years or more at baseline (2815 men and 3965 women); 3430 individuals (2207 men and 1223 women) with established CVD at baseline (self-reported myocardial infarction, stroke or angina pectoris); and 3064 persons with missing data on one or more of the following variables: serum cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and smoking status. Our calculations are thereby based on information from 52 087 individuals (24 235 men and 27 852 women) aged 20–74 years and free from known CVD at baseline.

Study variables

In the HUNT 2 survey, total serum cholesterol was measured by an enzymatic colorimetric cholesterol esterase method [92]. The blood pressure of persons in a seated position was measured by a specially trained personnel using Dinamap 845XT, based on oscillometry. The cuff size was adjusted after measuring the arm circumference, and blood pressure was recorded as the mean values of the second and third measurements performed consecutively at the same visit. Smoking was defined as daily smoking of cigarettes, cigars or a pipe.

Follow-up

The personal identity number of Norwegian citizens enabled linking of HUNT 2 participant data to the Cause of Death Registry at Statistics Norway (information on http://www.ssb.no/english/). For the present analysis, each participant contributed person–time from the date of clinical examination (August 1995–June 1997) until 10 years of follow-up had been achieved (until August 2005–June 2007, depending on participation dates) or until the date of death if this occurred in the follow-up period, making the oldest participants of the study 84 years of age at the end of the follow-up. The follow-up time came to a total of 510 297 person-years. Death from CVD was defined by the International Classification of Disease code for the primary diagnosis of death (ICD-9: 390-459; ICD-10: I 00-I 99) as well as death from IHD (ICD-9: 410-414; ICD-10: I 20-I 25).

Statistical analysis

The first part of our analysis involved making a simple CVD risk estimation chart to compare with the charts currently recommended for clinical practice in Norway. We used the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart of the European Society of Cardiology [2,15] and the nationally adjusted chart used in the Norwegian National Guidelines [17] as a reference. These charts are intended to depict the 10-year risk of dying from CVD, given the level of risk factors at baseline: sex, age, smoking status, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol. To have a meaningful amount of data for each square of our chart, we based it on three age groups (20–39, 40–59 and 60–74 years), two levels of systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg vs. ≥140 mm Hg, in accordance with guidelines), smokers vs. non-smokers, and two levels of total cholesterol. Regarding cholesterol, the levels <5.5 mmol L−1 vs. ≥5.5 mmol L−1 were used (cut-off approximately 215 mg dL−1). This cut-off point assigns 40% of participating males and 43% of females to the ‘low level’ category. Using a cut-off point of 5.0 mmol L−1 (which guidelines [2,16] state that cholesterol should be below) would have assigned only 24% of males and 27% of females to the lower cholesterol stratum. The median cholesterol level of the participants was 5.7 mmol L−1 for both genders. The observed mortality rates per 1000 person-years were calculated for each square of the chart.

For the next part of our analysis, we used Cox proportional hazard models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for overall mortality and mortality from CVD and IHD, associated with different levels of cholesterol at baseline. The precision of the estimated associations was assessed by a 95% confidence interval (CI). Departure from the proportional hazard assumptions was evaluated by Schoenfeld residuals.

We computed sex-specific HRs for cholesterol as a continuous variable as well as a variable with four categories (<5.0, 5–5.9, 6.0–6.9 and ≥7.0 mmol L−1). We adjusted for the other variables of the aforementioned chart, namely age (in the timescale), systolic blood pressure (as a continuous variable) and smoking status. We also ran an alternative model including the same variables, in addition to waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), level of physical activity, self-reported diabetes mellitus and family history of CVD. The categorical cholesterol variable was tested for linear as well as quadratic trend. Finally, we conducted an analysis of cholesterol as a dichotomous variable with the cut-off point of 5.5 mmol L−1, stratified by smoking status, and an analysis of the effect of smoking stratified by the dichotomous cholesterol variable for comparison.

All statistical tests were two-sided and all analyses were performed using Stata for Windows (version 11; StataCorp LP, TX, USA).

Ethics statement

Each participant in the HUNT study signed a written consent regarding the screening and the use of data for research purposes as well as linking their data to other registers (subject to the approval of the Norwegian Data Inspectorate). The study was approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate and the Regional Committee for Ethics in Medical Research.

Results

Figure 1 shows CVD mortality for the HUNT 2 population during the 10-year follow-up period (mortality rates per 1000 person-years), according to each level of the risk factors found in the international SCORE system. This model showed a general trend towards increased mortality for an increase in any of the included risk factors, except for cholesterol, where no such association was observed. The results were similar regarding all-cause mortality and IHD mortality (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ten-year incidence of fatal cardiovascular disease per 1000 person-years in the population of Nord-Trøndelag (HUNT 2 study).

Table 1 shows the sex-specific associations of different levels of serum cholesterol with mortality, both total mortality and CVD and IHD mortality. Among women, serum cholesterol had an inverse association with all-cause mortality as well as CVD mortality (although not reaching statistical significance) (Table 1). The association with IHD mortality appeared to follow a U-shaped curve. Test for quadratic trend did not support the existence of a U-shaped curve (P = 0.16).

Table 1.

Risk of death from all causes, cardiovascular disease and ischaemic heart disease among individuals aged 20–74; associations of total cholesterol with mortality

All causes Cardiovascular disease Ischaemic heart disease



Cholesterol (mmol L−1) No. of persons No. of deaths Adjusted* HR (95% CI) Ptrend No. of deaths Adjusted* HR (95% CI) Ptrend No. of deaths Adjusted* HR (95% CI) Ptrend
Men
<5.0 5 918 208 1.00 (Reference) 58 1.00 (Reference) 24 1.00 (Reference)
5.0–5.9 8 021 410 0.77 (0.65–0.92) 132 0.80 (0.59–1.09) 65 0.94 (0.59–1.50)
6.0–6.9 6 658 500 0.84 (0.71–0.99) 168 0.87 (0.64–1.18) 85 1.06 (0.67–1.67)
≥7.0 3 638 329 0.89 (0.74–1.06) 0.90 128 1.05 (0.76–1.44) 0.25 57 1.12 (0.69–1.81) 0.39
per unit increase 24 235 1447 0.98 (0.93–1.03) 0.35 486 1.06 (0.98–1.15) 0.17 231 1.08 (0.96–1.22) 0.18
Women
<5.0 7 613 98 1.00 (Reference) 19 1.00 (Reference) 9 1.00 (Reference)
5.0–5.9 8 565 243 0.92 (0.72–1.17) 59 0.90 (0.53–1.52) 19 0.61 (0.27–1.38)
6.0–6.9 6 404 327 0.84 (0.66–1.06) 91 0.81 (0.49–1.35) 32 0.60 (0.28–1.30)
≥7.0 5 270 375 0.72 (0.57–0.92) 0.001 121 0.74 (0.44–1.22) 0.13 56 0.72 (0.34–1.51) 1.00
per unit increase 27 852 1043 0.94 (0.89–0.99) 0.02 290 0.97 (0.88–1.07) 0.53 116 1.07 (0.92–1.24) 0.37
*

Adjusted for age (in the timescale), smoking (current vs. not) and systolic blood pressure (continuous).

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Among men, cholesterol did not seem to be linearly associated with mortality but rather the association followed a U-shaped pattern, with the lowest mortality appearing in the second cholesterol category (5.0–5.9 mmol L−1). This was apparent in all mortality categories. Consequently, cholesterol analysed as a continuous variable did not show a statistically significant linear association with mortality. Test for quadratic trend yielded P = 0.01 for all-cause mortality (indicating a true U-curve), P = 0.055 for CVD (approaching statistical significance) and P = 0.80 for IHD (practically excluding a U-curve). The associations between cholesterol and mortality are visualized in Figs 24.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Risk of death (all causes) associated with different levels of total cholesterol. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for men (blue box) and women (red diamond) separately. Adjusted for age, smoking and systolic blood pressure.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Risk of death from ischaemic heart disease associated with different levels of total cholesterol. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for men (blue box) and women (red diamond). Adjusted for age, smoking and systolic blood pressure.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Risk of death from cardiovascular disease associated with different levels of total cholesterol. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for men (blue box) and women (red diamond). Adjusted for age, smoking and systolic blood pressure.

A sensitivity analysis adjusting for four additional risk factors (WHR, physical activity and family history) revealed results of no considerable difference from the first model (adjusting for age, smoking and systolic blood pressure) for either sex.

The association of a dichotomous cholesterol variable with mortality, stratified by smoking status, is shown in Table 2. The HRs relate to the risk of dying among individuals with high serum cholesterol (≥5.5 mmol L−1) compared with those with lower levels (<5.5 mmol L−1). Having cholesterol levels above 5.5 mmol L−1 was not associated with increased mortality, either among smokers or among non-smokers.

Table 2.

Risk of death from all causes, cardiovascular disease and ischaemic heart disease depending on smoking status for individuals 20–74 years old; hazard ratios for high* total cholesterol compared with low cholesterol levels

Men Women


Cause of death Level of cholesterol* No. of persons No. of deaths Adjusted HR (95% CI) No. of persons No. of deaths Adjusted HR (95% CI)
All causes
Smokers High 4726 476 0.87 (0.73–1.03) 5 406 339 1.00 (0.77–1.31)
Low 2680 180 1.00 (Reference) 3 795 75 1.00 (Reference)
Non-smokers High 9724 573 0.94 (0.80–1.10) 10 485 503 0.74 (0.60–0.91)
Low 7105 218 1.00 (Reference) 8 166 126 1.00 (Reference)
CVD
Smokers High 4726 181 0.92 (0.68–1.24) 5 406 94 1.09 (0.60–2.00)
Low 2680 58 1.00 (Reference) 3 795 13 1.00 (Reference)
Non-smokers High 9724 182 0.91 (0.68–1.21) 10 485 160 1.00 (0.63–1.57)
Low 7105 65 1.00 (Reference) 8 166 23 1.00 (Reference)
IHD
Smokers High 4726 89 1.03 (0.66–1.59) 5 406 46 1.19 (0.48–2.93)
Low 2680 26 1.00 (Reference) 3 795 6 1.00 (Reference)
Non-smokers High 9724 88 1.00 (0.65–1.53) 10 485 56 0.96 (0.45–2.06)
Low 7105 28 1.00 (Reference) 8 166 8 1.00 (Reference)
*

Comparison of high (≥5.5 mmol L−1) vs. low (<5.5 mmol L−1) total cholesterol.

Adjusted for age (in the timescale), smoking (current vs. not) and systolic blood pressure.

CVD, cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IHD, ischaemic heart disease.

Smoking, on the other hand, was strongly associated with increased mortality in all mortality categories among both sexes (Table 3). Among women, the association was somewhat stronger for those with cholesterol below 5.5 mmol L−1.

Table 3.

Risk of death from all causes, cardiovascular disease and ischaemic heart disease depending on levels of total cholesterol for individuals 20–74 years old; hazard ratios for smoking compared with non-smoking

Men Women


Cause of death Smoking status No. of persons No. of deaths Adjusted* HR (95% CI) No. of persons No. of deaths Adjusted* HR (95% CI)
All causes
High cholesterol Smoking 4726 476 2.09 (1.71–2.55) 5 406 339 1.72 (1.29–2.30)
Non-smoking 2680 180 1.00 (Reference) 3 795 75 1.00 (Reference)
Low cholesterol Smoking 9724 573 1.99 (1.76–2.24) 10 485 503 2.16 (1.87–2.48)
Non-smoking 7105 218 1.00 (Reference) 8 166 126 1.00 (Reference)
CVD
High cholesterol Smoking 4726 181 2.30 (1.61–3.29) 5 406 94 1.82 (0.91–3.64)
Non-smoking 2680 58 1.00 (Reference) 3 795 13 1.00 (Reference)
Low cholesterol Smoking 9724 182 2.44 (1.98–3.00) 10 485 160 2.24 (1.73–2.91)
Non-smoking 7105 65 1.00 (Reference) 8 166 23 1.00 (Reference)
IHD
High cholesterol Smoking 4726 89 2.28 (1.34–3.90) 5 406 46 2.35 (0.80–6.95)
Non-smoking 2680 26 1.00 (Reference) 3 795 6 1.00 (Reference)
Low cholesterol Smoking 9724 88 2.42 (1.80–3.25) 10 485 56 3.08 (2.07–4.58)
Non-smoking 7105 28 1.00 (Reference) 8 166 8 1.00 (Reference)
*

Adjusted for age (in the timescale), smoking (current vs. not) and systolic blood pressure.

High total cholesterol ≥5.5 mmol L−1.

Low total cholesterol <5.5 mmol L−1.

CVD, cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IHD, ischaemic heart disease.

Discussion

In this validation study of current guidelines for CVD prevention, which is based on new epidemiological data from a large and representative Norwegian population, we found total cholesterol to be an overestimated risk factor.

Regarding the association between total cholesterol and mortality, our results generally indicated U-shaped or inverse linear curves for total and CVD mortality. Only the association with IHD among men could be interpreted as suggesting a positive, linear trend.

Our results contradict the guidelines' well-established demarcation line (5 mmol L−1) between ‘good’ and ‘too high’ levels of cholesterol. They also contradict the popularized idea of a positive, linear relationship between cholesterol and fatal disease. Guideline-based advice regarding CVD prevention may thus be outdated and misleading, particularly regarding many women who have cholesterol levels in the range of 5–7 mmol L−1 and are currently encouraged to take better care of their health.

Our finding of significant discrepancies between epidemiological data and clinical guidelines [2,16,17], suggesting a linear relation between total cholesterol and mortality from CVD is in accord with other studies [61,66,67].

The main strengths of our study are the prospective and comprehensive nature of the HUNT 2 survey, its good participation rates, and representativeness of the entire Norwegian population of similar, i.e. Nordic, origin. A corresponding weakness is the lack of immediate generalizability to Norwegians with other ethnic backgrounds. Another potential weakness of our study is the lack of information about cholesterol-lowering drug treatment among the participants. However, this is unlikely to be an important source of bias as our population was free from CVD at baseline, and cholesterol-lowering drugs were not recommended for primary prevention in the study period.

It is possible that the Norwegian HUNT 2 population differs somewhat from earlier study populations in levels of CVD risk factors and mortality, and that this may affect (or confound) the association of cholesterol with mortality. Norway is an affluent country, and Norwegians are currently one of the longest lived people in the world [93]. The rate of smoking among men is relatively low, by international comparison [93]. The stable social structure could also play a part, including a well-functioning health care system with good access and coverage for all.

Various studies have shown cholesterol, smoking and high blood pressure to have a multiplicative effect on IHD risk rather than an additive effect [9497]. It may be that cholesterol acts differently as a risk factor for IHD than previously believed, at least in certain risk factor combinations and/or under certain developmental and contextual circumstances, such as those mentioned earlier. At least in some settings, cholesterol may represent a risk marker and/or a weak risk factor rather than an important one. More valid risk factors might be found by further investigation of lipoproteins and/or other subparticles of cholesterol, but the same dilemmas may arise in relation to those entities. What appears evident, however, is that more updated and complex disease prediction models are needed.

Regarding the immediate future of guidelines and combined risk estimates for CVD, we envisage three options: first, IHD mortality (and not overall CVD mortality) might be considered an appropriate end point for the current risk estimates. However, our results (Table 1) indicate that even such a limited focus would be problematic, at least for women. Alternatively, total cholesterol could be excluded from the risk estimates, potentially being replaced either by nothing or by some different subparticle(s) of cholesterol with better predictive properties, such as HDL or HDL/total cholesterol [2,8,16]. Finally, future risk estimates may be based on more nuanced statistical models, allowing for gender- and age-specific associations between cholesterol and disease development (mortality).

The Norwegian guidelines for prevention of CVD [17] include a risk estimation model developed on the basis of Norwegian population data [21]. This model assumes a linear association of cholesterol with CVD mortality, and the authors do not indicate that any evaluation of the linearity of the association has taken place, i.e. an evaluation of a possible U-shaped association. Selmer et al. included participants, aged 20–67, in their study, while we included people up to 74 years old, and the U-shaped association has been most prominent in studies, including participants over age 60. This difference should, however, be minimized by the statistical adjustments made for the effects of age. Besides the included age groups, there is no reason to believe that the Norwegian population data underlying the Norwegian guidelines differ considerably from the HUNT 2 population.

To address the question of whether the U-shaped association was age-dependent in the HUNT population, we performed an age-stratified Cox-regression analysis post-hoc. The results indicated a U-shaped association of cholesterol with CVD mortality among men aged 40–74, and an inverse association among women aged 60–74. Because of limited statistical power, we refrain from emphasizing these results. Seen in the light of previous studies [37,55,58,61,6466,7377], it is possible that a U-shaped association is primarily a phenomenon related to people aged 60 years and older.

Our smoking-stratified analysis (Table 2) indicated that the U-shaped association can possibly be found among both smokers and non-smokers, as no considerable difference was observed between these two strata. Analysis with more categories of cholesterol levels would have been preferable here, but due to limited statistical power, we refrain from further analyses post-hoc.

In contrast to cholesterol, the detrimental effect of smoking was clearly evident even after stratifying for cholesterol levels (Table 3). This emphasizes the importance of smoking as a CVD risk factor compared with cholesterol.

Conclusions

Based on epidemiological analysis of updated and comprehensive population data, we found that the underlying assumptions regarding cholesterol in clinical guidelines for CVD prevention might be flawed: cholesterol emerged as an overestimated risk factor in our study, indicating that guideline information might be misleading, particularly for women with ‘moderately elevated’ cholesterol levels in the range of 5–7 mmol L−1. Our findings are in good accord with some previous studies. A potential explanation of the lack of accord between clinical guidelines and recent population data, including ours, is time trend changes for CVD/IHD and underlying causal (risk) factors.

‘Know your numbers’ (a concept pertaining to medical risk factor levels, including cholesterol) is currently considered part of responsible citizenship, as well as an essential element of preventive medical care. Many individuals who could otherwise call themselves healthy struggle conscientiously to push their cholesterol under the presumed ‘danger’ limit (i.e. the recommended cut-off point of 5 mmol L−1), coached by health personnel, personal trainers and caring family members. Massive commercial interests are linked to drugs and other remedies marketed for this purpose. It is therefore of immediate and wide interest to find out whether our results are generalizable to other populations.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; the Norwegian Medical Association's Funds for Research in General Practice; and the Research Fund of the Icelandic College of Family Physicians.

Acknowledgments

We thank the HUNT Research Centre for contributing HUNT 2 data. Data collection in HUNT 2 was a financial collaboration between the HUNT Research Centre at the Faculty of Medicine of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, The Nord-Trøndelag County Council, and Levanger Hospital in Nord-Trøndelag.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Total Cardiovascular Risk. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third joint task force of European and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of eight societies and by invited experts). Executive summary. European Heart Journal. 2003;24:1601–1610. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00347-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.HEART UK[website] Maidenhead, UK: hyperlipidemia education & atherosclerosis reasearch trust UK; 2008. Available at: http://www.heartuk.org.uk (last accessed 25 July 2011) [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Under 5 [website] Oslo, Norway: Vita Hjertego'; Available at: http://www.Under5.no (last accessed 25 July 2011) [Norwegian] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines subcommittee. Journal of Hypertension. 1999;17:151–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. Journal of Hypertension. 2003;21:1983–1992. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200311000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) European Heart Journal. 2007;28(12):1462–1536. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) European Heart Journal. 2011;32:1769–1818. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization. Arterial hypertension and ischaemic heart disease. Preventive aspects. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. 1962;231:1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.World Health Organization. Diabetes mellitus. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. 1985;727:1–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization. 1993 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Memorandum from a World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension meeting. Guidelines subcommittee of the WHO/ISH mild hypertension liaison committee. Hypertension. 1993;22:392–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;289:2560–2572. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PWF, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. American Heart Journal. 1991;121:293–298. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–1847. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. European Heart Journal. 2003;24(11):987–1003. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Atherosclerosis. 2007;194:1–45. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Norheim OF, Gjelsvik B, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Retningslinjer for individuell primærforebygging av hjerte- og karsykdommer [Guidelines for Individual Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease] Oslo, Norway: Helsedirektoratet; 2009. [Norwegian] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hartz I, Njølstad I, Eggen AE. Does implementation of the European guidelines based on the SCORE model double the number of Norwegian adults who need cardiovascular drugs for primary prevention? The Tromsø study 2001. European Heart Journal. 2005;26(24):2673–2680. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Neuhauser HK, Ellert U, Kurth BM. A comparison of Framingham and SCORE-based cardiovascular risk estimates in participants of the German national health interview and examination survey 1998. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 2005;12(5):442–450. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000183909.52118.9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lindman AS, Veierød MB, Pedersen JI, Tverdal A, Njølstad I, Selmer R. The ability of the SCORE high-risk model to predict 10-year cardiovascular disease mortality in Norway. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 2007;14(4):501–507. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328011490a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Selmer R, Lindman AS, Tverdal A, Pedersen JI, Njølstad I, Veierød MB. Modell for estimering av kardiovaskulær risiko i Norge [A model for estimation of cardiovascular risk in Norway] Tidsskrift for Den Norske Legeforening. 2008;128(3):286–290. [Norwegian] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barroso LC, Muro EC, Herrera ND, Ochoa GF, Hueros JI, Buitrago F. Performance of the Framingham and SCORE cardiovascular risk prediction functions in a non-diabetic population of a Spanish health care centre: a validation study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2010;28(4):242–248. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.518407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Getz L, Sigurdsson JA, Hetlevik I, Kirkengen AL, Romundstad S, Holmen J. Estimating the high risk group for cardiovascular disease in the Norwegian HUNT 2 population according to the 2003 European guidelines: modelling study. British Medical Journal. 2005;331:551–554. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38555.648623.8F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Petursson H, Getz L, Sigurdsson JA, Hetlevik I. Can individuals with a significant risk for cardiovascular disease be adequately identified by combination of several risk factors? Modelling study based on the Norwegian HUNT 2 population. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2009;15:103–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00962.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Getz L, Kirkengen AL, Hetlevik I, Romundstad S, Sigurdsson JA. Ethical dilemmas arising from implementation of the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2004;22:202–208. doi: 10.1080/02813430410006693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Petursson H, Getz L, Sigurdsson J, Hetlevik I. Current European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension: are they adequate for use in primary care? Modelling study based on the Norwegian HUNT 2 population. BMC Family Practice. 2009;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Danesh J, Collins R, Peto R. Lipoprotein(a) and coronary heart disease. Meta-analysis of prospective studies. Circulation. 2000;102:1082–1085. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–3421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ingelsson E, Schaefer EJ, Contois JH, et al. Clinical utility of different lipid measures for prediction of coronary heart disease in men and women. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007;298:776–785. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.7.776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McQueen MJ, Hawken S, Wang X, et al. Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2008;372:224–233. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61076-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009;302(18):1993–2000. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ip S, Lichtenstein AH, Chung M, Lau J, Balk EM. Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;150:474–484. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mora S. Advanced lipoprotein testing and subfractionation are not (yet) ready for clinical use. Circulation. 2009;119:2396–2404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.819359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.O'Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2010;376(9735):112–123. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60834-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Doyle JT, Heslin AS, Hilleboe HE, Formel PF, Korns RF. A Prospective study of degenerative cardiovascular disease in Albany: report of three years' experience – 1. Ischemic heart disease. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health. 1957;47:25–32. doi: 10.2105/ajph.47.4_pt_2.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stamler J, Wentworth D, Neaton JD. Is relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? Findings in 356 222 primary screenees of the multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT) Journal of the American Medical Association. 1986;256:2823–2828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Anderson KM, Castelli WP, Levy D. Cholesterol and mortality – 30 years of follow-up from the Framingham study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987;257:2176–2180. doi: 10.1001/jama.257.16.2176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Neaton JD, Blackburn H, Jacobs D, Kuller L, Lee DJ, Sherwin R, Shih J, Stamler J, Wentworth D. Serum cholesterol level and mortality findings for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1992;152(7):1490–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Smith GD, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG, Rose G. Plasma cholesterol concentration and mortality. The Whitehall study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992;267:70–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Iso H, Naito Y, Kitamura A, Sato S, Kiyama M, Takayama Y, Iida M, Shimamoto T, Sankai T, Komachi Y. Serum total cholesterol and mortality in a Japanese population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994;47(9):961–969. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90110-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Law MR, Wald NJ, Wu T, Hackshaw A, Bailey A. Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: data from the BUPA study. British Medical Journal. 1994;308:363–366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Verschuren WM, Jacobs DR, Bloemberg BP, et al. Serum total cholesterol and long-term coronary heart disease mortality in different cultures. Twenty-five-year follow-up of the seven countries study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;274(2):131–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wannamethee G, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Walker M. Low serum total cholesterol concentrations and mortality in middle aged British men. British Medical Journal. 1995;311:409–413. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Njølstad I, Arnesen E, Lund-Larsen PG. Smoking, serum lipids, blood pressure, and sex differences in myocardial infarction. A 12-year follow-up of the Finnmark study. Circulation. 1996;93:450–456. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.3.450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stamler J, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, Dyer AR, Greenland P, Neaton JD. Relationship of baseline serum cholesterol levels in 3 large cohorts of younger men to long term coronary, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality and to longevity. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284(3):311–308. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.3.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. Cholesterol, coronary heart disease, and stroke in the Asia Pacific region. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003;32:563–572. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Prospective Studies Collaboration. Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55 000 vascular deaths. Lancet. 2007;370(9602):1829–1839. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61778-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Clarke R, Emberson J, Fletcher A, Breeze E, Marmot M, Shipley MJ. Life expectancy in relation to cardiovascular risk factors: 38 year follow-up of 19 000 men in the Whitehall study. British Medical Journal. 2009;339:b3513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Beaglehole R, Foulkes MA, Prior IA, Eyles EF. Cholesterol and mortality in New Zealand Maoris. British Medical Journal. 1980;280:285–287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6210.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kozarevic D, McGee D, Vojvodic N, Gordon T, Racic Z, Zukel W, Dawber T. Serum cholesterol and mortality. The Yugoslavia cardiovascular disease study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1981;114:21–28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Forette B, Tortrat D, Wolmark Y. Cholesterol as risk factor for mortality in elderly women. Lancet. 1989;1(8643):868–870. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92865-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jacobs D, Blackburn H, Higgins M, et al. Report of the conference on low blood cholesterol: mortality associations. Circulation. 1992;86(3):1046–1060. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.3.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Harris T, Feldman JJ, Kleinman JC, Ettinger WH, Makuc DM, Schatzkin AG. The low cholesterol-mortality association in a national cohort. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1992;45:595–601. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90131-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Higgins M, Keller JB. Cholesterol, coronary heart disease, and total mortality in middle-aged and elderly men and women in Tecumseh. Annals of Epidemiology. 1992;2:69–76. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(92)90039-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Krumholz HM, Seeman TE, Merrill SS, Mendes de Leon CF, Vaccarino V, Silverman DI, Tsukahara R, Ostfeld AM, Berkman LF. Lack of association between cholesterol and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity and all-cause mortality in persons older than 70 years. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994;272:1335–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ibarren C, Reed DM, Chen R, Yano K, Dwyer JH. Low serum cholesterol and mortality – which is the cause and which is the effect? Circulation. 1995;92:2396–2403. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jonsson A, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. Total cholesterol and mortality after age 80 years. Lancet. 1997;350:1778–1779. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Weverling-Rijnsburger AWE, Blauw GJ, Lagaay AM, Knook DL, Meinders AE, Westendorp RGJ. Total cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old. Lancet. 1997;350:1119–1123. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04430-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schatz IJ, Masaki K, Yano K, Chen R, Rodriguez BL, Curb D. Cholesterol and all-cause mortality in elderly people from the Honolulu Heart Program: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358:351–355. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05553-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Onder G, Landi F, Volpato S, Fellin R, Carbonin P, Gambassi G, Bernabei R. Serum cholesterol levels and in-hospital mortality in the elderly. American Journal of Medicine. 2003;115(4):265–271. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00354-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Petersen LK, Christensen K, Kragstrup J. Lipid-lowering treatment to the end? A review of observational studies and RCTs on cholesterol and mortality in 80± year olds. Age and Ageing. 2010;39(6):674–682. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ravnskog U. High cholesterol may protect against infections and atherosclerosis. QJM: Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians. 2003;96(12):927–934. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rossouw JE, Gotto AM. Does low cholesterol cause death? Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. 1993;7:789–793. doi: 10.1007/BF00878932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Forette F, de la Fuente X, Golmard JL, Henry JF, Hervy MP. The prognostic significance of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. Results of a ten year longitudinal survey. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. Part A, Theory and Practice. 1982;4(7):1177–1191. doi: 10.3109/10641968209060782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nissinen A, Pekkanen J, Porath A, Punsar S, Karvonen MJ. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease among 55 to 74 year-old Finnish men: a 10-year follow-up. Annals of Medicine. 1989;21(23):239–240. doi: 10.3109/07853898909149943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lindquist P, Bengtsson C, Lissner L, Bjorkelund C. Cholesterol and triglyceride concentration as risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in women, with special reference to influence of age. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2002;251:484–489. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tsuji H. Low serum cholesterol levels and increased ischemic stroke mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2011;171:1121–1123. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Iso H, Jacobs DR, Wentworth D, Neaton JD, Cohen JD. Serum cholesterol levels and six-year mortality from stroke in 356 977 men screened for the multiple risk factor intervention trial. New England Journal of Medicine. 1989;320:904–910. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904063201405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Prospective Studies Collaboration. Cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and stroke: 13 000 strokes in 45 000 people in 45 prospective cohorts. Lancet. 1995;346:1647–1653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Eastern Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease Collaborative Research Group. Blood pressure, cholesterol and stroke in Eastern Asia. Lancet. 1998;352:1801–1807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cui R, Iso H, Toyoshima H, et al. Serum total cholesterol levels and risk of mortality from stroke and coronary heart disease in Japanese: the JACC study. Atherosclerosis. 2007;94:415–420. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li W, Liu M, Wu B, Liu H, Wang LC, Tan S. Serum lipid levels and 3-month prognosis in Chinese patients with acute stroke. Advances in Therapy. 2008;25:329–341. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0045-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Räihä I, Marniemi J, Puukka P, Toikka T, Ehnholm C, Sourander L. Effect of serum lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins on vascular and nonvascular mortality in the elderly. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17(7):1224–1232. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.7.1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Shestov DB, Deev AD, Klimov AN, Davis CE, Tyroler HA. Increased risk of coronary heart disease death in men with low total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Russian lipid research clinics prevalence follow-up study. Circulation. 1993;88:846–853. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weijenberg MP, Feskens EJ, Bowles CH, Kromhout D. Serum total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure as risk factors for mortality from ischemic heart disease among elderly men and women. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994;47:197–205. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Weijenberg MP, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. Total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol as risk factors for coronary heart disease in elderly men during 5 years of follow-up. The Zutphen elderly study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1996;143:151–158. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Simons LA, Simons J, Friedlander Y, McCallum J. Cholesterol and other lipids predict coronary heart disease and ischaemic stroke in the elderly, but only in those below 70 years. Atherosclerosis. 2001;159:201–208. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(01)00495-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Okamura T, Tanaka H, Miyamatsu N, Hayakawa T, Kadowaki T, Kita Y, Nakamura Y, Okayama A, Ueshima H. The relationship between serum total cholesterol and all-cause or cause-specific mortality in a 17.3-year study of a Japanese cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2007;190:216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Sex matters: secular and geographical trends in sex differences in coronary heart disease mortality. British Medical Journal. 2001;323:541–545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Leon DA, Sterne JA, Ebrahim S. Secular trends in mortality by stroke subtype in the 20th century: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2002;360:1818–1823. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11769-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):557–567. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Midthjell K, Krokstad S. Overvekt og fedme. In: Krokstad S, Knudtsen MS, editors. Folkehelse i endring. Helseundersøkelsen i Nord-Trøndelag. HUNT 1 (1984–86) – HUNT 2 (1995–97) – HUNT 3 (2006–08) [Public health development. The HUNT Study, Norway] Levanger, Norway: HUNT Research Center; 2011. pp. 60–64. [Norwegian]. Available at: http://www.ntnu.no/documents/10304/1130562/folkehelse-i-endring-huntrapport-2011.pdf (last accessed 25 July 2011) [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lin JK, et al. National, regional, and global trends in systolic blood pressure since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 786 country-years and 5.4 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):568–577. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62036-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Fardzafar F, Finucane MM, Danaei G, et al. National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3.0 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):578–586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Stuckler D, King L, McKee M. Mass privatisation and the post-communist mortality crisis: a cross-national analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:399–407. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ramsay SE, Whincup PH, Hardoon SL, Lennon LT, Morris RW, Wannamethee SG. Social class differences in secular trends in established coronary risk factors over 20 years: a cohort study of British men from 1978–80 to 1998–2000. PloS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhang P, Dong G, Sun B, et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and mortality due to cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease in Shenyang, China. Plos ONE. 2011;6(6):e20827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Grøntved A, Hu FB. Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011;305:2448–2455. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kastorini CM, Milionis HJ, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Goudevenos JA, Panagiotakos DB. The effect of Mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome and its components: a meta-analysis of 50 studies and 534 906 individuals. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;57(11):1299–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Martínez-González MA, García-López M, Bes-Rastrollo M, Toledo W, Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Delgado-Rodriguez M, Vazquez Z, Benito S, Beunza J. Mediterranean diet and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: a Spanish cohort. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Disease. 2011;21(4):237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Holmen J, Midthjell K, Krüger Ø, Langhammer A, Holmen TL, Bratberg GH, Vatten L, Lund-Larsen PG. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995-7 (HUNT 2): objectives, contents, methods and participation. Norsk Epidemiologi. 2003;13:19–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS2011_Full.pdf (last accessed 25 July 2011) [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Dawber TR, Moore FE, Mann GV. Coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health. 1957;47:4–24. doi: 10.2105/ajph.47.4_pt_2.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A, Revotskie N, Stokes J. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease – six year follow-up experience. The Framingham study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1961;55:33–50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-55-1-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Smoking and cardiovascular disease. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1984;32(52):677–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jackson R, Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Mine RJ, Rodgers A. Treatment with drugs to lower blood pressure and cholesterol based on an individual's absolute cardiovascular risk. Lancet. 2005;365(9457):434–441. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17833-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES