Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 9;12(2):1738–1757. doi: 10.3390/s120201738

Table 7.

Identification performance by different number of training samples.

Rank-one recognition rate Lowest rank of perfect recognition rate
1 training sample 99.06% 17
2 training samples 99.06% 17
3 training samples 99.72% 6
4 training samples 100% 1
5 training samples 100% 1
6 training samples 100% 1
7 training samples 100% 1
8 training samples 100% 1