Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):1126–1139. doi: 10.1121/1.2823453

TABLE III.

Correlations between the various stimuli presented at posttest and during generalization for each training group (see Table I for abbreviations). Rows are blocked by training condition and the specific materials used during posttest are indicated by italicized font (posttest values only contain the subset of materials on which subjects did not receive explicit feedback). Values along the diagonal indicate the percent correct recognition scores for the stimuli.

Training MRT PB AS HS ENV
MRT MRT 37% r=0.77** r=0.57* r=0.67** n.s.
PB 43% r=0.55* r=0.65** n.s.
AS 48% r=0.90** n.s.
HS 67% n.s.
ENV 38%
PB MRT 43% r=0.66*** r=0.51** n.s. r=0.55**
PB 46% r=0.53** n.s. n.s.
AS 48% n.s. n.s.
HS 66% n.s.
ENV 35%
AS MRT 31% n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.
PB 44% n.s. n.s. r=0.45*
AS 62% r=0.63*** n.s.
HS 67% n.s.
ENV 35%
HS MRT 27% r=0.59** r=0.62*** r=0.40* n.s.
PB 44% r=0.73*** r=0.51** r=0.57**
AS 59% r=0.55** n.s.
HS 64% n.s.
ENV 39%
ENV MRT 33% n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.
PB 43% n.s. n.s. n.s.
AS 49% r=0.69*** n.s.
HS 68% n.s.
ENV 46%

Only statistically significant correlations are displayed (* p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001).