Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 18;7(3):304–313. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr010

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Feedback-locked ERPs, averaged over the three status groups (n = 36), showing that negative feedback elicited a more negative-going ERP in the latency range typically associated with the MFN (here: 220–320 ms), compared with the ERP elicited by positive feedback. The dotted line represents the difference wave created by subtracting the ERP associated with positive feedback from the ERP associated with negative feedback.