Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;41(1):200–209. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr238

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Step-by-step illustration of our bump-hunting algorithm. (A) Logit-transformed methylation measurements are plotted against the outcome of interest (gestational age) for a specific probe j. A regression line obtained from fitting the model presented in Equation 1 is shown as well. The estimated slope Inline graphic is retained for the next step. (B) For 48 consecutive probes, the estimated Inline graphic are plotted against their genomic location tj. The specific estimated slope from the probe in (A) is indicated by ‘A’ and an arrow. The blue curve represents the smooth estimate Inline graphic obtained using loess. (C) The smooth estimate Inline graphic from (b) is shown but here with predefined thresholds represented by red horizontal lines. The region for which Inline graphic exceeds the lower threshold is considered a candidate DMR. The area shaded in grey is used as a summary statistic. (D) A null distribution for the area summary statistic described in (c) is estimated by performing using permutations (as described in the text). The histogram summarizes the null areas obtained from permutations and estimates the null distribution. The area obtained from the region shown in (C) is highlighted with an arrow and the label ‘C’. Note that this DMR region is not statistically significant as it can easily happen by chance