Table 1.
Comparison of EQ-5D self-description assessment between control (DOTS) and intervention (SCIDOTS) groupsa
Dimension | Assessment | Baseline | End of 3 months | End of 6 months | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOTS (n = 46) | SCIDOTS (n = 40) | p-value | DOTS (n = 46) | SCIDOTS (n = 40) | p-value | DOTS (n = 46) | SCIDOTS (n = 40) | p-value | ||
No problem | 32 (69.6%) | 27 (67.5%) | 43 (93.5%) | 37 (92.5%) | 43 (93.5%) | 39 (97.5%) | ||||
MOBILITY | Moderate problem | 13 (28.3%) | 13 (32.5%) | 0.603 | 3 (6.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 1.000 | 3 (6.5%) | 1 (2.5%) | 0.620 |
Severe problem | 1 (2.2%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||||
No problem | 34 (73.9%) | 29 (72.5%) | 43 (93.5%) | 36 (90.0%) | 44 (95.7%) | 39 (97.5%) | ||||
SELF-CARE | Moderate problem | 11 (23.9%) | 11 (27.5%) | 0.612 | 3 (6.5%) | 4 (10.0%) | 0.700 | 2 (4.3%) | 1 (2.5%) | 1.000 |
Severe problem | 1 (2.2%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||||
No problem | 31 (67.4%) | 18 (45.0%) | 37 (80.4%) | 34 (85.0%) | 35 (76.1%) | 38 (95.0%) | ||||
USUAL ACTIVITIES | Moderate problem | 12 (26.1%) | 22 (55.0%) | 0.011 | 9 (19.6%) | 5 (12.5% | 0.395 | 11 (23.9%) | 2 (5.0%) | 0.015b |
Severe problem | 3 (6.5%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.5%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||||
No problem | 16 (34.8%) | 13 (32.5%) | 34 (73.9%) | 33 (82.5%) | 40 (87.0%) | 40 (100.0%) | ||||
PAIN | Moderate problem | 27 (58.7%) | 27 (67.5%) | 0.234 | 11 (23.9%) | 7 (17.5%) | 0.474 | 6 (13.0%) | 0 (0) | 0.028 |
Severe problem | 3 (6.5%) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.2%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||||
No problem | 20 (43.5%) | 17 (42.5%) | 36 (78.3%) | 35 (87.5%) | 41 (89.1%) | 38 (95.0%) | ||||
ANXIETY | Moderate problem | 24 (52.2%) | 21 (52.5%) | 0.988 | 9 (19.6%) | 4 (10.0%) | 0.466 | 5 (10.9%) | 2 (5.0%) | 0.442 |
Severe problem | 2 (4.3%) | 2 (5.0%) | 1 (2.2%) | 1 (2.5%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
aFisher's Exact and bChi-square (χ2) tests were applied in calculating p-values