Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transpl Int. 2012 Feb 2;25(4):409–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01431.x

Table 3.

Estimated Number of Lives Saved if 25 Additional Livers were Available Each Month and the Additional Livers were Allocated by Each Model(From January 2006 through June 2009)

Allocation Model Number of Lives Saved P Values for pairwise comparisons
Time on the Waiting List 144 P < 0.0001 (compared to each of the other scores)
UKELD (8) 788 P=0.022 compared to Updated MELD
P<0.001 compared to each of the other scores.
Updated MELD (7) 846 P=0.25 compared to MELD, br1>P=0.67 compared to Refitmeldna
P=0.072 compared to MESO
P=0.067compared to ReFitMELDNA
P=0.054 (compared to MELDNa)
P=0.021 compared to ReFit MELD
MELD (1, 2) 867 P> 0.17 compared to each of the scores below on this table
MESO Index (5) 879 P> 0.58 compared to each of the scores on this table below
ReFit MELDNa (9) 882 P> 0.73 compared to each of the scores below on this table
MELDNa (6) 884 P=0.86 compared to ReFit MELD
ReFit MELD (9) 887