Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Dec 6;35(4):963–968. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23535

Table 1.

Comparison of overall image quality score and artifact severity score evaluated from the results of NC-MRA and CE-MRA.

Aorta IQ
Artifact
Segment NC-MRA CE-MRA p-value NC-MRA CE-MRA p-value
SOV 3.11±0.65 2.86±0.56 0.301 2.72±0.86 2.75±0.55 0.842
STJ 3.31±0.62 2.94±0.64 0.720 3.14±0.59 2.83±0.51 0.109
AA 3.17±0.77 3.25±0.67 0.770 2.92±0.84 2.94±0.51 0.929
ARCH 3.42±0.91 3.39±0.53 0.941 3.17±0.97 3.22±0.46 0.979
DA 3.81±0.35 3.69±0.35 0.489 3.61±0.44 3.56±0.38 0.827
DIAPH 3.81±0.35 3.78±0.26 0.718 3.56± 0.38 3.56±0.34 0.750
GV 2.39±0.78 3.58±0.49 0.0001* 1.61± 0.81 3.50±0.57 0.0004*
CA 2.31±0.93 1.53 ±0.50 0.013* 1.92±1.17 1.0±0.64 0.017*

SOV= Sinus of Valsalva; STJ=Sinotubular Junction; AA= Ascending Aorta; ARCH= Aortic Arch; DA= Descending Aorta; DIAPH= Diaphragmatic Aorta; GV= Great Vessels; CA= Coronary Arteries.

*

p value <0.05 and indicates statistically significant