Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Dec 6;35(4):963–968. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23535

Table 2.

The mean ± standard deviation of each measure in centimeters derived by NC-MRA and CE-MRA, p values from paired-sample student’s t-test to compare methods, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference between methods for the same subject and the percentage of times the measures derived from the same subject differed by at least 3 mm in absolute value.

Aorta Segment Diameter
95% CI
Difference > 3mm
NC-MRA CE-MRA p-value Lower Upper
SOV 3.54 ± 0.76 3.64 ± 0.69 0.036* 0.007 0.190 11.8% (2)
STJ 3.09 ± 0.76 3.22 ± 0.78 0.011* 0.035 0.229 23.5% (4)
AA 3.20 ± 0.80 3.28 ± 0.80 0.013* 0.017 0.130 0% (0)
ARCH 2.48 ± 0.47 2.51 ± 0.45 0.257 −0.031 0.107 5.9% (1)
DA 2.39 ± 0.34 2.45 ± 0.31 0.044* 0.002 0.128 5.9% (1)
DIAPH 2.04 ± 0.32 2.08 ± 0.32 0.250 −0.025 0.090 11.8% (2)

SOV= Sinus of Valsalva; STJ=Sinotubular Junction; AA= Ascending Aorta; ARCH= Aortic Arch; DA= Descending Aorta; DIAPH= Diaphragmatic Aorta; GV= Great Vessels; CA= Coronary Arteries.

*

p value <0.05 and indicates statistically significant.