Table 2. QoL therapy procedures showing the best possible effectiveness for the five therapeutic options to cure diseased QoL in the context of the care pathway.
Procedure | 1. Physiotherapy | 2. Psychotherapy | 3. Social support | 4. Pain therapy | 5. Nutrition and fitness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Definition of therapeutic option and methodsa | Physical decongestive therapy of upper limb by manual lymph drainage with sequential compression therapy | Individual, experiential psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural interventions for adjustment disorders | Network nodes for social counselling (financial security, well-being, partnership, children, homecare, profession) organised in quality circle | Combination of drugs (WHO analgesic ladder) with non-drug measures, for example, psychotherapy and disease-modifying therapies | Combination of self-help groups: counselling for diet and ambulatory sports training programmes, all enrolled in quality circles |
Level of evidence for an effective outcome measureb | 1 Questionable effective (Preston et al, 2009) | 1 Effective for QoL (Newell et al, 2002) | 4 GCP Effectiveness not tested | 1 Effective for pain (Hanks et al, 2001) | 4 GCP Effectiveness not tested (Beliveau and Gingras, 2005) |
Methodological standard achieved in local consensus of recommendationsc | Formal consensus, Nominal Group Process (Lorenz et al, 2001) | Informal consensus, decisions, cases analysed in quality circle | Informal consensus within quality circle | Informal consensus, locally tailored guidelines, in quality circle | Informal consensus, developed only within QoL unit |
Abbreviations: GCP=good clinical practice; QoL=quality of life.
General sources of information (Lorenz et al, 2001).
German national guideline for breast cancer (http://www.AWMF.de) in 2009.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system in 1999.
German guideline manual in 2001 (Lorenz et al, 2001).