Table 3. Summary of susceptibility testing comparing PAO method with EUCAST and E-test methods.
Antifungal | PAO vs EUCAST | PAO vs E-TEST | EUCAST vs E-TEST | ALL TESTS |
AMB | 91.2 | 88.2 | 91.2 | 82.4 |
CAS | 88.2 | 88.2 | 88.2 | 82.4 |
ITR | 82.4 | 79.4 | 85.3 | 79.4 |
VOR | 79.4 | 82.4 | 82.4 | 76.5 |
ANI | 91.2 | 91.2 | 88.2 | 85.3 |
AVERAGE | 86.5 | 85.9 | 86.5 | 81.2 |
Results of testing the panel of 34 strains noted in the Methods against AMB, CAS, ITR, VOR, and ANI. The percentage of exact matches was scored (S [sensitive] vs S, R [resistant] vs R, and where relevant I [intermediate] vs I) for pairwise comparisons between different tests and perfect agreement between all three tests.