Table 3. Summary of susceptibility testing comparing PAO method with EUCAST and E-test methods.

Antifungal	PAO vs EUCAST	PAO vs E-TEST	EUCAST vs E-TEST	ALL TESTS
AMB	91.2	88.2	91.2	82.4
CAS	88.2	88.2	88.2	82.4
ITR	82.4	79.4	85.3	79.4
VOR	79.4	82.4	82.4	76.5
ANI	91.2	91.2	88.2	85.3
AVERAGE	86.5	85.9	86.5	81.2

Results of testing the panel of 34 strains noted in the Methods against AMB, CAS, ITR, VOR, and ANI. The percentage of exact matches was scored (S [sensitive] vs S, R [resistant] vs R, and where relevant I [intermediate] vs I) for pairwise comparisons between different tests and perfect agreement between all three tests.