Table 1. Number of differentially-enriched functions and pathways in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) using different false discovery rate (FDR) correction thresholds of the raw P-values.
FDR cut off for Functions | FDR cut off for Pathways | DEG | ||||||||||||
Comparison | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 1.00 | Overall | Eligible IPA |
–15 vs. –30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1320 | 696 |
1 vs. –30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 29 | 38 | 3688 | 2027 |
15 vs. –30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2703 | 1507 |
30 vs. –30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3242 | 1877 |
60 vs. –30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 32 | 3980 | 2175 |
120 vs. –30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 3821 | 2092 |
240 vs. –30 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 21 | 91 | 1502 | 874 |
300 vs. –30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 1522 | 843 |
1 vs. –15 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 38 | 2038 | 1198 |
15 vs. 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1326 | 753 |
30 vs. 15 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 110 | 112 | 235 | 146 |
60 vs. 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 38 | 81 | 97 | 378 | 211 |
120 vs. 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 327 | 184 |
240 vs. 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2027 | 1107 |
300 vs. 240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 52 | 83 | 356 | 215 |
Reported is the number of functions, pathways and DEG enriched at the specified FDR cut-off. Legend: FDR = false discovery rate cut-off applied in the function/pathway analysis; DEG = differentially expressed genes, with “Overall” denoting the total number of DEG and “Eligible in IPA” the number of DEG eligible for function/pathway analysis in IPA.