Table 2.
Willingness to have stayed and visited a California Indian casino if smoking were prohibited
| Measure | Never smokers (63.2%) |
Former smokers (24.5%) |
Current smokers (12.3%) |
F-Testc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrons (n = 3361) | ||||
| Casino Stay a | Column % | Column % | Column % | |
| Shorter length of stay | 4.4% | 3.7% | 29.3% | |
| Same length of stay | 45.9% | 49.0% | 57.5% | |
| Longer length of stay | 49.7% | 47.3% | 13.2% | 38.9¥ |
| Casino Visit b | ||||
| Visit less likely | 2.6% | 2.0% | 22.5% | |
| No difference | 55.3% | 62.2% | 70.5% | |
| Visit more likely | 42.1% | 35.8% | 7.0% | 37.9¥ |
| Non-Patrons (n = 7015) | ||||
| Casino Visit b | Column % | Column % | Column % | |
| Visit less likely | 5.7% | 6.7% | 11.2% | |
| No difference | 70.6% | 75.0% | 83.3% | |
| Visit more likely | 23.7% | 18.3% | 5.5% | 13.7¥ |
¥p < .0001. aHypothetical question about shortening or extending one's stay, asked only among past-year patrons. bHypothetical question about visiting a casino in the future, asked among patrons and non-patrons. cF statistic (svy: tab) is based on a second order correction