Table 4.

Unadjusted prevalence and logistic regression models comparing the PARAs and RMCs with other Army infantry (INF) on adverse health outcomes

		Cases, n (%)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	N
GHQ	INF	132 (24)
	PARAs	36 (18)	0.73 (0.48–1.09)	0.81 (0.51–1.27)a	728
	RMCs	34 (13)	0.46 (0.31–0.70)	0.58 (0.36–0.93)b	659
Fatigue	INF	207 (37)
	PARAs	48 (25)	0.55 (0.38–0.80)	0.51 (0.34–0.78)c	721
	RMCs	66 (24)	0.55 (0.40–0.76)	0.62 (0.43–0.89)d	811
Alcohol use disorders identification test	INF	147 (26)
	PARAs	59 (30)	1.24 (0.87–1.78)	1.31 (0.85–2.02)e	630
	RMCs	72 (26)	1.02 (0.73–1.41)	1.38 (0.95–2.02)f	826
Physical symptoms	INF	92 (16)
	PARAs	16 (8)	0.45 (0.26–0.78)	0.40 (0.22–0.72)g	727
	RMCs	19 (7)	0.39 (0.23–0.65)	0.36 (0.20–0.64)h	798

Number of cases (n), percentages (%), OR, 95% CIs are displayed together with numbers for the adjusted models (N).

^aAdjusted for age, rank, childhood adversity, theatre of deployment, coming under small arms fire and unit cohesion.

^bAdjusted for age, rank, childhood adversity, theatre of deployment, perception of work in theatre and unit cohesion.

^cAdjusted for rank, childhood adversity, theatre of deployment, thought might be killed and unit cohesion.

^dAdjusted for childhood adversity, theatre of deployment and unit cohesion.

^eAdjusted for age, childhood adversity, time deployed for in past 3 years, theatre of deployment, unit cohesion and time between leaving theatre and completing the questionnaire.

^fAdjusted for age, rank, childhood adversity and theatre of deployment.

^gAdjusted for rank, time deployed for in past 3 years, theatre of deployment, saw personnel wounded or killed and unit cohesion.

^hAdjusted for rank, childhood adversity, time deployed for in past 3 years, theatre of deployment, saw personnel wounded or killed and unit cohesion.