Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 5;60(7):552–559. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqq129

Table 5.

Negative binomial regression models of PCL-C scores in the paratroopers (PARAs) and RMCs compared with other INF and comparing the PARAs and RMCs

PCL-C Cases, n (%) Unadjusted IRR Adjusted IRR N
INF 36 (6)
PARAs 12 (6) 0.75 (0.58–0.96) 0.91 (0.70–1.18)a 622
RMCs 7 (3) 0.54 (0.43–0.67) 0.64 (0.52–0.79)b 800
PARAs 12 (6)
RMCs 7 (3) 0.72 (0.52–1.00) 0.69 (0.49–0.98)c 456

Number of cases (n), percentages (%), IRR, and 95% CIs are displayed together with numbers for the final models (N).

a

Adjusted for rank, childhood adversity, theatre of deployment, coming under small arms fire, thought might be killed, unit cohesion and time between leaving theatre and completing the questionnaire.

b

Adjusted for rank, childhood adversity, theatre of deployment, coming under small arms fire, saw personnel wounded or killed and unit cohesion.

c

Adjusted for childhood adversity, time deployed for in past 3 years, theatre of deployment, time spent in a forward area, saw personnel wounded or killed and unit cohesion.