Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Dec;18(6):562–569. doi: 10.1037/a0021964

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting Lifetime Stimulant Use Disorders From Depressed Mood and Anhedonia Among Respondents With Lifetime History of Stimulant Use

Univariate
Combineda
Unadjusted
Unadjusted
Adjustedb
Adjustedc
Predictor OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Outcome: Amphetamine dependence
Depressed mood 2.30 (1.71–3.10) <.0001 1.20 (0.76–1.90) .44 1.29 (0.80–2.08) .30 1.15 (0.72–1.84) .56
Anhedonia 2.69 (1.99–3.65) <.0001 2.34 (1.47–3.73) .0004 2.20 (1.36–3.57) .001 1.85 (1.15–3.00) .01

Outcome: Cocaine dependence
Depressed mood 2.30 (1.84–2.87) <.0001 1.03 (0.73–1.48) .84 1.11 (0.77–1.60) .56 1.04 (0.72–1.50) .76
Anhedonia 2.87 (2.29–3.59) <.0001 2.79 (1.95–3.98) <.0001 2.81 (1.95–4.06) <.0001 2.22 (1.53–3.22) <.0001

Note. N = 1718 for amphetamine analyses; N = 2490 for cocaine analyses. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

a

Models include anhedonia and depressed mood as simultaneous predictors.

b

Adjusted for demographics (age, region, ethnicity/race, marital status, sex, and education).

c

Adjusted for demographics and lifetime history of nondepressive psychiatric disorder, disorder, alcohol use disorder, nonstimulant drug use disorder, and nonstimulant drug use.