TABLE 1.
Summary of Evaluation Design for the Four Water Conservation Strategies
Conservation Strategies and Evaluation Design | Sample Size | Date of Installation or Start of Implemention | Pre Period | Post Period or Simulation Period | Time Period Excluded From Analysis | Confounding Factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Residential WSICS – Evaluation 1: Comparison of experimental group's outdoor water use prior to and after WSICS installation; weather controlled for by comparing to control group's outdoor water use during same time periods | Control: 71 Experiment: 9 (2 households in the Pilot Group for Evaluation 2 below were excluded from this analysis, as they joined the study in 2006-2007) | Summer of 2005 | 2001-2004 quarterly water use data from dedicated outdoor water meters | 2006-2007 quarterly water use data from dedicated outdoor water meters | 2005 water use data were excluded, because 2005 was a transitional year | Participation was voluntary. Self-selection may bias sample toward (1) high initial water users (expect positive savings) or (2) conservative initial water users (expect negative savings) |
Residential WSICS – Evaluation 2: Comparison of experimental group's actual water use prior to WSICS installation to simulated water use with WSICS for same period, using known historic weather records | Experiment: 11 | Summer of 2005 (9 participants) Summers of 2006 or 2007 (2 participants) | 2003-2004 actual annual aggregated outdoor water use | 2003-2004 simulated annual aggregated outdoor water use | ||
Municipal WSICS – Comparison of actual water use prior to WSICS installation to simulated water use with WSICS for same period, using known historic weather records | 5 ball fields | Summer of 2005 | 2003-2004 actual annual aggregated water use | 2003-2004 simulated annual aggregated water use | ||
Rainwater harvesting – Comparison of domestic (public) summer water use prior to and after installation of rainwater harvesting system; comparison of rainwater use and rainfall capture efficiency between 0.76 and 3.03 m3 systems | 0.76 m3 (200-gallon) tank: 26 3.03 m3 (800-gallon) tank: 11 1.38 m3 (365-gallon) tank: 1 2.27 m3 (600-gallon) tank: 1 | Mid-April 2006 | 2004-2005 domestic water use | 2006-2007 domestic water use 2006-2007 rainwater use | Substantial difference in scale between domestic and rainwater use | |
Audit/retrofit and rebate programs – Comparison of winter water use prior to and after audit/retrofit event or installation of one or more rebate-qualifying appliance; participants grouped into mutually exclusive categories by type of participation. Control group used to control for external causes of pre v. post differences | Audit/Retrofit: 99 Rebate-toilet: 87 Rebate-washer: 527 Rebate-toilet and washer: 30 Audit/Retrofit and Rebate (toilet and/or washer): 32 Control group: 5,050 | Variable, beginning September 2003 for Audit/Retrofits and July 2003 for Rebates | Quarterly winter water use from February 2001 to audit date or appliance installation date Control group established for each pre v. post period | Quarterly winter water use from audit date or appliance installation date to May 2007 Control group established for each pre v. post period | Only winter quarters included: (began on or after October 19 and ended on or before April 14) | |
Soil amendments – Comparison of simulated water use between control and experimental fields during same period, using known historical weather records and known weather triggers for irrigation on both fields | Control: 1 Experiment: 1 | 2003-2007 simulated water use data for control field | 2003-2007 simulated water use data for experimental field |