Table 2.

Overview of survival results (in percent) SE and 95% CI of single-surface ART restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers in primary posterior teeth by location and year of survival

Authors	Location	Year of survival
		1			2			3
		Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI
Honkala et al. [73]	Clinic	99	2.0		91	4.0
Taifour et al. [74]	Clinic	95	1.0		91	1.3		86	1.8
Yip et al. [75] and Yu et al. [76]a	Clinic	95	3.8		89	6.5
Yip et al. [75] and Yu et al. [76]b	Clinic	94	4.5		94	4.5
Louw et al. [77]	School	96	2.3
Luo et al. [78] and Lo et al. [79]	School	93	3.4		94	3.8
Van Gemert et al. [17]	School							43	10.9
Ersin et al. [80]	School	100	0.8
Menezes et al. [34]	Clinic	82	7.3
Yassen [81]	School	74	7.3
Weighted mean score		95		91–98	93		91–94	66		13–99

SE standard error

^a,bSame study but different glass ionomer cement