Table 4.

Overview of survival results (in percent) SE and 95% CI of single-surface ART restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers in permanent posterior teeth by location and year of survival

Authors	Location	Year of survival
		1			2			3			4			5			6
		Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI	Survival	SE	CI
Cefaly et al. [14]	School	94	8.0
Ercan et al. [26]	School	86	8.9		81	9.4
Farag et al. [5]	Clinic	96	2.4											85	5.4
PAHO [4]	School	90	0.9		83	1.2
PAHO [4]	School	98	0.6		97	0.7
PAHO [4]	School	96	1.2		94	1.4
Van Gemert et al. [17]	Field							30	8.2
Frencken et al. [18]	School	99	0.8		94	1.8		88	2.0
Ziraps et al. [82]	Clinic				93	4.3
Lo et al. [83]	School	97	1.0		94	1.5		90	2.0		86	2.0		82	2.5		74	3.0
Ho et al. [84]	Clinic				94	4.3
Kikwilu et al. [85]	School	96	1.5
Luo et al. [78] and
Lo et al. [79]	School	96	2.3		96	2.3
Rahimtoola et al. [19]	School	98	1.5		94	2.5		94	2.3
Frencken et al. [86]	Clinic	93	1.5		88	1.5		85	2.0		80	2.0		76	2.5		69	3.0
Loh [3]	School	97	1.3		96	1.5		96	1.5		92	3.0
Yip et al. [87] and
Gao et al. [88]	Clinic	100	2.3		94	7.3
Mickenautsch et al. [89]	Clinic	94	2.5
Weighted mean scores		96		94–97	93		89–95	85		77–91	86		78–93	80		76–83	72		67–76

SE standard error