Table 3.
Variable | Numbers of patients |
Association with HOMA-IR
TRF & IP risk factor adjusted IR β-Coefficient OR (95% CI) # |
---|---|---|
RF +ve * | 90 (47%) | 0.867 (0.204, 1.530) |
ACPA +ve * | 66 (35%) | 1.423 (0.701, 2.146) |
RF-ve/ACPA -ve | 96 (49%) | 0 |
RF +ve/ ACPA -ve † |
29 (15%) | -0.015 (-0.973, 0.944) |
ACPA+ve/ RF -ve† |
6 (3%) | 0.932 (-0.898, 2.763) |
Both RF+ve/ACPA+ve † | 60 (31%) | 1.472 (0.695, 2.250) √ |
* = Seropositive vs. seronegative for RF and ACPA (n = 193 and 191, respectively)
† = Patients stratified into four groups depending on autoantibody status and compared with other groups (n = 191)
√ = Model significantly different in patients positive for both RF and ACPA relative to those RF positive only (P = 0.0061) with age and gender and other parameters adjusted.)
▲Linear regression producing β-coefficients were used for continuous outcome. β-coefficients are considered statistically significant if their 95% CI values do not include zero.
#Logistic regression producing odds ratios used for binary outcomes. Odds ratios are considered significant if the 95% CI values do not include 1.
ACPA, anti-CCP antibody; IP, inflammatory polyarthritis; RF, rheumatoid factor.