Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):342–347. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.009

Table 2.

Distribution and comparison of categoric lab-based and BMI-based risk scores (n=71,280)

BMI-based risk
Low, <10% Moderate, 10% 20% High, >20%
Lab-based risk n=37,490
(52.9%)
n=18,398
(25.8%)
n=15,392
(21.6%)
 Low, <10% n=44,819
(62.9%)
36,870
51.7%
7,787
10.9%
162
0.2%
 Moderate, 10% 20% n=17,374
(24.4%)
618
0.9%
10,210
14.3%
6546
9.2%
 High, >20% n=9,087
(12.8%)
2
0.0%
401
0.6%
8684
12.2%

Marginal distribution of each risk score is provided, with proportion in each risk category shown parenthetically. The body of the table shows the joint distribution of the two risk scores, with cell-proportions displayed. Shaded cells highlight where the categoric risk scores are concordant.