TABLE 2.
Pearson Correlation Coefficients Between Degree of Activity in Three Regions of Interest (ROIs) and Amount of Longitudinal Change in TOWRE Sight Word Reading Efficiency Standard Scores
Latency Bin (msec) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROI | 150–200 | 200–250 | 250–300 | 300–350 | 350–400 | 400–450 | 450–500 | 500–550 | 550–600 | 600–650 | 650–700 | 700–750 | 750–800 |
MTG (LH) | .54 | .55 | |||||||||||
VOT (LH) | .54 | .52 | .53 | .52 | .54 | .57 | .54 | .53 | |||||
MTL (RH) | .60 | .57 |
Only significant coefficients with Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) Word reading efficiency are shown (r > .50, p < .02; there were no significant correlations with degree of activity in STG). Corresponding coefficients with TOWRE Pseudoword Reading Efficiency were < .2 in all cases. Data for the entire group of reading difficulties students (N = 20) are displayed. MTG = middle temporal; MTL = medial temporal lobe; STG = superior temporal; VOT = ventral occipitotemporal.