TABLE 2.
Latency Bin (msec) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROI | 150–200 | 200–250 | 250–300 | 300–350 | 350–400 | 400–450 | 450–500 | 500–550 | 550–600 | 600–650 | 650–700 | 700–750 | 750–800 |
MTG (LH) | .54 | .55 | |||||||||||
VOT (LH) | .54 | .52 | .53 | .52 | .54 | .57 | .54 | .53 | |||||
MTL (RH) | .60 | .57 |
Only significant coefficients with Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) Word reading efficiency are shown (r > .50, p < .02; there were no significant correlations with degree of activity in STG). Corresponding coefficients with TOWRE Pseudoword Reading Efficiency were < .2 in all cases. Data for the entire group of reading difficulties students (N = 20) are displayed. MTG = middle temporal; MTL = medial temporal lobe; STG = superior temporal; VOT = ventral occipitotemporal.