Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 6;104(6):441–451. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs125

Table 2.

CYP2D6 genotyping and prevalence of CYP2D6 metabolism phenotype in BIG 1-98 trial participants*

CYP2D6 allele Assessable, No. Polymorphic alleles, No. (%) Genotype, %
SNP Homozygous Heterozygous Wild-type
CYP2D6*4 1846G>A (rs2892097) 3828 1444 (18.9) 8.6 20.5 70.9
CYP2D6*2, *4, *10, *41 4180G>C (rs1135840) 0
CYP2D6*10,*4 100C>T (rs1065852) 0
CYP2D6*41 2988G>A (rs28371725) 3842 643 (8.4) 4.2 8.4 87.4
CYP2D6*3 2549delA (rs35742686) 3012 80 (1.3) 0.4 1.9 97.7
CYP2D6*6 1707delT (rs5030655) 2707 101 (1.9) 0.2 3.3 96.5
CYP2D6*7 2935A>C (rs5030867) 2767 0 0.0 0.0 100.0
CYP2D6*17 1023C>T (rs28371706) 0
2850C>T (rs16947) 2285 1550 (33.9) 16.2 35.4 48.4
CYP2D6 metabolism phenotype, No. (%)
Patients classified 4393 (100.0)
    Poor metabolizer 365 (8.3)
    Intermediate metabolizer 1294 (29.5)
    Extensive metabolizer 2734 (62.2)
*

BIG = Breast International Group; CYP2D6 = Cytochrome P450 2D6; SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism; — = not applicable.

CYP2D6*4 (1846G>A; rs2892097) and CYP2D6*41 (2988G>A; rs28371725) were genotyped in all 4861 patient DNA samples; other alleles were genotyped in 3691 patient DNA samples. One hundred seventy-nine patient DNA samples failed CYP2D6 genotyping. Genotyping was done using polymerase chain reaction–based methods.

Patients were categorized into predicted metabolism phenotypes as follows: poor metabolizer (PM) phenotypes were homozygous or compound heterozygous for CYP2D6*3, CYP2D6*4, CYP2D6*6 or CYP2D6*7 alleles (PM alleles); intermediate metabolizer (IM) phenotypes carried either homozygous CYP2D6*41 alleles (IM alleles) or a CYP2D6*41 allele in combination with a PM allele (ie, IM/IM or IM/PM alleles, respectively; n = 215 patients; 5%), or were heterozygous carriers of one PM or IM allele with an extensive metabolizer (EM) allele (heterozygous for EM allele or hetEM; n = 1079 patients; 24.5%); EM phenotypes were characterized by the absence of PM and IM alleles.