Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 6;14(4):445–450. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr142

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

(A) Time-related prevalence of atrial fibrillation (solid line) and 68% CLs (broken lines) after a hybrid monolateral approach with a monopolar device. (B) Time-related prevalence of atrial fibrillation (solid line) and 68% CLs (broken lines) after a hybrid bilateral approach with bipolar device. (C) Time-related prevalence of atrial fibrillation by AF type after a hybrid monolateral approach with a monopolar device. (D) Time-related prevalence of atrial fibrillation by AF type after a hybrid bilateral approach with a bipolar device.