Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Dec 12;68(2):495–506. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23257

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The ratio of CBF/True CBF is compared for SVD, rSVD, cSVD, and bSVD methods, for a range of representative β values with ATD = 5 s at different MTT values: A and D correspond to MTT = 6 s, B and E correspond to MTT = 12 s, and C and F correspond to MTT = 24 s, for SNR = 5 and 20, respectively. TR = 1 s and N = 13 were assumed, and PSVD = 0.2 was applied for all SVD methods. bSVD outperformed rSVD and cSVD for all MTT and β values.